UGC NET June 2012 exam unfair cut off and result- What should you do

Injustice by UGC

For the last few days all we can see everywhere is many candidates who appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) 2012 saying that they have been duped by UGC. As per the reports, National Eligibility Test (NET) results were made online over the official website on 18th September, 2012 and next to this the UGC allegedly have changed the Test’s qualification norms for the general category candidates and made an aggregate of 65 per cent for all three of the NET’s papers to become eligible for lectureship.

Click here For Supreme Court’s Decision on UGC NET Unfair Criteria

Several candidates are planning to move the Court against the supposed post-result alteration of the Test’s qualification norms by the authority. And we are going to tell you how!

Here are the 6 steps to do it the right way:

First step

The first step would be, not to file a suit right away but try to settle the matter with the UGC officials. Here are some of whom you can contact:

Prof. Ved Prakash
Chairman (Actg.)

University Grants Commission
Tel: 23234019,23239659
Fax: 23239659

Shri Ashok Thakur
Secretary
Ministry of Human Resource Development
( Department of Higher Education )
New Delhi- 110001
Tel: 23386451,23382698,
E-mail : secy.dhe@nic.in
Fax: 23385807

Smt, Anjuly Chib Duggal
Additional Secretary
Department of Expenditure
Ministry of Finance
Room No.142-B,North Block
New Delhi-110001

for a more complete list visit: http://www.ugc.ac.in/page/Commission-Members.aspx

Second Step

If no reply is forthcoming from the UGC officials, its time to get your guns going. Get an attorney who is willing to fight your case. State your problems carefully and concisely. As lawyers are expensive, it would be wise for a number of candidates to come together and jointly fight the case. Unlike popular belief, you can’t file a Public Interest Litigation in this case. PILs are for cases more massive and grave than this.

Third Step

File a case in the Delhi High Court as UGC comes under Delhi Court’s jurisdiction. As soon as the case is accepted, appeal for a stay order on UGC’s working on the NET results.  This must be done as usually within 30 days of the result declaration, UGC destroys the OMR sheets, So the case should be filed immediately with the appeal that Court must direct UGC not to destroy OMR sheets till final decision of the court. It is better to join the NET applicants of all the subjects.

Fourth Step

The appeal may be presented before the court with following points:

  1. From so many years the qualifying marks were 50%, which were further reduced to 45% by the UGC.
  2. This time also UGC declared that the qualifying marks for PAPER 1 and paper 2 will be 40 % and for Paper 3 will be 50%. So the qualifying marks should be 50% only.
  3. They can reduce their standard by 5% as they used to do earlier. They cant raise the limit above 50% in any case.
  4. Declaring 65% as qualifying marks is sheer cheating by the UGC, and injustice to thousand of candidates.
  5. Whatever be criteria it has to told before collecting exam fee and conducting the tests. The UGC cannot change horses in midstream.

Fifth Step

Proper evidence must be provided to back up the claims made in the suit. This can include brochures, Exam Papers, Press notices issued by UGC containing the selection criterion, etc. This evidence must be submitted along with the suit.

Sixth Step

Once all the above steps have been completed and the suit filed, the next step is to wait for the hearing date and attend the court hearings. Most of the work here will be done by the lawyer but still the presence of the suit filer is expected. Once the judge gives his/her judgment, depending on the judgment, the filer may have the provision to appeal once again in a higher court, i.e, the Supreme Court if he/she is dissatisfied with this judgment. Even there, a second appeal may be made but the filer has to accept the decision of the court and withdraw his/her case.

So there it is. All that you require to file a suit against UGC for what you have been wronged. Best of luck with the suit, and keep us updated should anyone decide to do this.

 

Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter, and Google+ to get updates like this directly on your wall.

About arkokoley

arkokoley is a Student, Blogger, Son, Brother, Coffee Addict and Internet Junkie. Founder, NXT Class, creator of Sani and a semi-regular author to IndiaExam.

Comments

  1. a big thank you … special request to Delhites to move the steps as it is difficult for people like me in North east…and kindly updates and do let us know if needed anyways…

    [Reply]

  2. thank u so much……………………………

    [Reply]

  3. pl do something for the same.Im a general candidate from Kerala,with 64.74 % overall total in Computer Science and Applications.It is impossible for candidates like me to file case in Delhi court..Pl Dlhites,on behalf of people like me..do it..

    [Reply]

  4. deep chowdhury says:

    The above mentioned lines are absolute true. I have personally prepared a letter and I am going to apply for the Rti Act under U/S.6. Has anyone seen the anwer keys where instead of the answers it is written as x.
    It is clearly injustice towards the candidates.I request to all the students to put their foots strong and apply for the rti act.Almost in all the subjects they have put X.And what about the students who have scored marks between 60% to 65%.Are they not eligible.?

    [Reply]

    ANIL SAINI Reply:

    YES IN ENGLISH PAPER 3 IT IS MARKED AS X

    [Reply]

    anonymous Reply:

    Friends “X” means question is invalid or wrong. dont consider that for calculating aggregate of paper1 paper2 and paper3.

    [Reply]

    Sushanta Panda Reply:

    Yes in paper III, Education Question No 37 marked as X, Why?

    [Reply]

  5. Ausaf Ahmad says:

    I am also suffering from ugc injustice towards the candidates. please do something……………

    [Reply]

  6. students in kerala have already taken steps to sue ugc. in high court .lawyer is kaleeshwaran raj .anyone ti known more on case contact adv

    [Reply]

    Dawn Reply:

    I am a candidate from Kerala who scored 62% from general category. Whom to be contacted for joining in the case at Kerala Highcourt

    [Reply]

    Alena joe Reply:

    THANK YOU, Radhika Ma’m for your kind information. I was also qualified net before the exam result arrived. After that i get shocked to hear the merit list. We have a group of people to be wanted to sue the file against it. So, kindly tell me the details to apply for it. ALENA, KERALA.

    [Reply]

    Firose Reply:

    You can contact Adv. Kaleeswaram Raj.
    Ph: 04842400675

    [Reply]

    muhammed Reply:

    iz dere any progress…..?

    Shilpa Mishra Reply:

    Shilpa Mishra

    Sir i have got 64.91% in management i am hurted to much and demotivated by the result

    RADHU GUPTA Reply:

    Sir i have got 64.91% in management and all of the three papers are clear still i didnt make out .

    Varun Murali Reply:

    Please see the Link Below.. Court Case Result on 30 Oct

    http://education.mathrubhumi.com/php/news_events_details.php?nid=28071

    [Reply]

  7. dear all

    kindly updated/ communicate to each -other regarding this ugc case.
    it is very essential to all of us.

    Kindly see this link:

    or mail to
    net.nagpur@gmail.com

    hope we’ll win this battle against UGC

    [Reply]

  8. There is a facebook group already.

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/156942054445283/

    [Reply]

    amit ekka Reply:

    .i am from jharkhand and have tha same probleme let me now abt the progress case of ugc…

    [Reply]

  9. Monaj Gorkela the supreme court lawyer is the best in india contact him 08800203555

    [Reply]

  10. gurdeep singh says:

    I m totaly upsat b’coj injustice criteria of ugc, im general candidate my total % 63.95%, i got 66.67%in paper 3rd,
    but my roll no. is not found in result so i wana justice, pl helpn suggest me.

    [Reply]

    nisha Reply:

    i got 64.37 percent in economics (general category)

    [Reply]

  11. SWAMINATHAN. S says:

    REPRESENTED THE MATTER TO THE UGC ON 27-09-2012 AS i MYSELF SCORED 64.89 % WHICH WAS ARBITRARILY ROUNDED OFF TO 64 %. THOSE FROM CHATTISHGARH CAN CONTACT ME TO HAVE HELP IN CASE OF LITIGATION. SWAMINATHAN. S ADVOCATE

    [Reply]

    Anoushka Priyom Reply:

    Mr Swaminathan
    My percentage is 64.94 in English. I am from general category. Plz suggest me the steps that I should take. 09864785472

    [Reply]

    nisha Reply:

    me with 64.37 percent in economics (general category)

    [Reply]

    A.K.SOOD Reply:

    I have also got 64.91% in management stream and have written following 2 letters to UGC. You may also pursue your case on these lines.

    Request For Ractification Of My UGC NET June-2012 Result. Roll No-48171250.
    Ashwini Sood ashwinisood@gmail.com

    Oct 4

    to webmaster
    Respecte Sir,

    1) I had appeared for UGC NET June-2012 test under the roll no.
    48171250. My stream was Management (code-17).

    2) In the result declared by UGC NET authorities, my roll no. does not
    appear in the list of successful candidates.

    3) In the marks list loaded by UGC, I have been shown having scored
    following percentage of marks in above test:

    Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    64.00% 70.83% 61.64 64.91%

    4) There is another candidate, under roll no. 48171248 ( named-MONIKA
    THIND)having the same stream of Management,( Code-17), who has scored
    the same aggregate percentage of marks i.e.64.91%,in mark list loaded
    byUGC and has been declared as a successfull candidate. The details
    are furnished below:-

    Paper-I Paper-II
    Paper-III Aggregate
    60.00% 70.83% 64.38% 64.91%

    5) Since, I have scored the same aggregate percentage of marks ie
    64.91%, as above candidate, therefor, as a matter of justice, I may
    also be placed in list of successful candidate, in the same manner, as
    above candidate has been placed,in above test.You will appreciate that
    there cannot be two differnet critarias of UGC, for two
    diffrentcandidates having scored the same aggregate percentage.

    6) Regarding Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III I have scored much high
    percentage than the criteria fixed for these Papers by UGC and also
    meet the qualifying criteria.

    7) In view of the facts and as a matter of justice, it is requested
    that my result of UGC NET June-2012 ,may be rectified and I may also
    be placed in the list of successful candidates,like other candidates,
    having scored same aggregate percentage of marks like me, i.e.64.91%.

    Thanking You,

    Yours Sincerly,

    Ashwani Kumar sood

    Request For Reconsideration Of My UGC NET June-2012 Result. Roll No-48171250
    Ashwini Sood ashwinisood@gmail.com

    Sep 29

    to webmaster
    Respected Sir,

    1) I had appeared for UGC NET June-2012 test under the roll no. 48171250. My stream was Management (code-17).

    2) In the result declared by UGC NET authorities, my roll no. does not appear in the list of successful candidates.

    3) For general category candidates, the criteria set by UGC for qualifying above test for Lectureship is as under:

    Category Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    General 40% 40% 50% 65%

    4) I am a general category candidate and in marks list loaded by UGC, I have been shown having scored following percentage of marks in above test:

    Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    64.00% 70.83% 61.64% 64.91%

    5) It would be observed from above that I have scored much higher percentage than qualifying percentage in all three papers i.e. Paper-1, Paper-2 and Paper-3 and also meet the qualifying criteria.

    6) In aggregate of percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3, I have scored 65.49%, i.e. if we add together the percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3 and divide it by 3. [(64%+70.83%+61.64%) /3]=65.49%,which is higher than the qualifying criteria fixed by UGC.

    7) In the detailed mark list uploaded by UGC NET authorities, my percentage of marks scored has been shown as 64.91% which is not acceptable, as UGC has neither made known the aggregate of the marks scored , nor the total aggregate marks, from which this percentage has been worked out. I presume (on the basis of revised answer key uploaded by UGC) that my percentage has been worked out from 342 marks and I having been scored 222 marks.

    8) If, this is the case, even then, I have scored. 222 marks, which are the same number of the marks, which are required out of 342 marks to be eligible to qualify the above test But due to mathematical error, while working out the percentage it works out to be 64.91%, fractionally less than 65%, mainly due to mathematical error, , which needs to be ignored.

    9) In view of facts submitted in foregoing paras, I would request you to reconsider my result and place me in the list of candidates having successfully cleared UGC NET June-2012 test and a certificate may also be issued confirming my clearing the above mentioned test.

    I shall be highly obliged by your early action.

    Thanking You,

    Yours Sincerely,

    Ashwani Kumar Sood
    Roll no.- 48171250 (UGC NET June-2012)

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz29up3ERd2

    [Reply]

    anonymous Reply:

    mr.Ashwani Kumar Sood, the score for getting 65% in management (all 3 papers total=222.3) . but u scored 222. because 4 invalid questions amounts to 350-8=342 (total). urs 222/342=64.91% . all the best next time.

    a.k.sood Reply:

    In aggregate of percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3, I have scored 65.49%, i.e. if we add together the percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3 and divide it by 3. [(64%+70.83%+61.64%) /3]=65.49%,which is higher than the qualifying criteria fixed by UGC.

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz2AIp9yraA

    surabhi singh Reply:

    i am very disappointed by UGC nomas , i am belong to sc category and i have got 54% in paper 1st , 44% in paper 2nd and 50% in paper 3rd , acc. to criteria i am quailifing the NET exam but i have not found my roll no. in the result list . please do something for students like me ……….

    Varun Murali Reply:

    Please see the Link Below.. Court Case Result on 30 Oct
    http://education.mathrubhumi.com/php/news_events_details.php?nid=28071

    [Reply]

  12. SWAMINATHAN. S says:

    discriminatory and arbitrary one.

    [Reply]

  13. really this is injustice as being in general we already have lot of challenge with high cutoff for JRF and now its lecturership also raised to 15 % without prior notice. not that it is after declaring result what they convey is that rules are made to broken at any point of time.
    so why always we be scapegoats in Mute posistion. exams are now getting suffered ultimately student are worst hit
    really we should have a word with authority.
    y so cheating take back this cheating clause.

    [Reply]

    Swati Reply:

    Would you have studied more, if you had known earlier that the cut-off marks were so high? Get real…..

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    I completely agree with Swati. Be real. If you had known before, would you have studied more than you did? Ask yourself. Instead of tasting the sour grapes, try to make them sweet by more hard work, so that you can relish the success in Dec. NET.

    [Reply]

    Isha Reply:

    Thanks for the nice suggession … I dont know you are a student or not.. you have suffered from JUNE 2012 results or not ? I think not.. UGC was not at all transparent.. they told that syllabus pattern will remain same .. but there was no elective in the paper from which we could have scored 40 marks (because everytime there are 20 questions from chosen elective ), we prepared for the elective and at a sudden found that there is no such section in the paper 3 and had to attempt the questions from all the electives compulsory .. this is really unfair on UGC part. Now tell me is still the result of June 2012 justified. They have to take back their decision…..

    [Reply]

    Arpita Reply:

    I agree with you Isha. I too had the same problem. We were not informed that the electives would be assimilated in the 3rd paper. If notified before the exam we would have worked hard to go through the electives as well!! So Mr/Ms Anonymous and Swati you guys too get real!!

    vibha Reply:

    you know i will tell you a story once in europe war was going on between two kings and people of one kingdom were relly in bad state . there was scarcity of food ,water cloth all necessities.one day the queen was going somewhere .as her charriot rode on the road ,people started running and shouting around her “bread,bread…..”
    she asked her minister the reason then he said “they are hungary and they dont have bread to eat”the queen replied “if they dont have bread then why dont they eat cake”so you are saying all this because you have not faced the brunt.

    [Reply]

  14. The fact is that the matter will be taken up by any High Court and so it is for everyone to work with their petition and not the one in Delhi alone. There is something happening at Madras HC as well

    [Reply]

  15. nagpur students already go to court against this poor decision made by UGC NET 2012..

    kindly see the link:

    http://education.oneindia.in/news/2012/10/01/students-of-net-approaches-court-plea-against-ugc-002890.html

    my humble request to all aspirant, who suffered to this unfair decision,
    they all go to court in their state & file a case against UGC’s Decision( NET Result June 2012).

    [Reply]

    gopal Reply:

    i have filed case in delhi highcourt on 17 oct and this will be taken on 1st week of november

    [Reply]

    Meenakshi Reply:

    Hi Gopal,
    Kindly let me know what was the court decision as i too am a victim of JUNE 2012 NET Result as i scored 56% and was depicted as passed but did not make it in the merit list.
    Hope to hear your reply.

    [Reply]

  16. Parijat Sarkar says:

    i want to help this candidates with money to file a case against ugc

    [Reply]

    nileenajayan Reply:

    the final decision from kerla high court is awaited. are u filed case in any of the court pl reply to me at e mail jayanpadikkery@g mail.com

    [Reply]

  17. Anand Bihari says:

    I am general candidate and got 64.57%…………
    I am so upset after declaration of result.

    [Reply]

    simmer Reply:

    same is the case with me …i got 64.89%……so close yet so far :-(

    [Reply]

    kumari arti Reply:

    i also support this step, i am from delhi is there any one to help me……….
    what should i do

    [Reply]

    Neeraj Reply:

    I am also from delhi.i want to file a case against ugc for unfare practice in declaring result.

    nileenajayan Reply:

    have u filed in the delhi high court. let me know

  18. Hello Friend
    kindly see the following link
    http://lislinks.com/forum/topics/any-one-from-u-p-to-move-to-hc-against-ugc-net-exam-result

    [Reply]

    nileenajayan Reply:

    have u filed case in your court. the decision from kerala high court is awaited. pl reply me in mail jayanpadikkery@g mail.com

    [Reply]

  19. Respected Sir/Madam,

    I am one of the many victims of UGC’s illogical policies related to NET June’12 results. Several of us might be in touch with you regarding this. I would also like to raise some points.

    The final qualifying criterion for lectureship has been changed for all the subjects this time around. Is the newly decided criterion a fair one? You (at UGC) must be having all the facts & figures related to NET June’12, but let me highlight some key facts:

    Total no. of candidates qualified: 40332 (lectureship) + 3625 (JRF) = 43957

    Candidates passed in:
    Management: 6716 (15%)
    Hindi: 6125 (14%)
    Geography: 3306 (7.5%)
    Commerce: 3211 (7.3%)
    Education: 2648 (6%)
    History: 2290 (5.2%)

    Total of above 6 subjects: 24296 i.e. 55% of total result.

    Most of the candidates passed from the above 6 subjects. The pass percentage of other (around 70+) subjects is combined 45% only. Are these figures justified?

    How can same criteria be fixed for all the subjects? It is totally unfair. The reason behind fixing this criterion is a huge percentage of candidates passing from Management, Hindi, Geography, Education, Commerce and History. Fixing this criterion for above 6 subjects is justified, but why the candidates of other subjects should suffer? Why the candidates of other subjects are being made scapegoats? What wrong have we done?

    You must be aware of the fact that there is huge no. of vacancies for eligible candidates in colleges & universities for subjects like Computer Science. But availability is negligible. Even this time, total of 184 candidates have qualified which is just 0.4% of the total result. Increasing cut-off to 65% for such subjects is unjust and unfair. For these subjects, like previous NET exams, minimum marks are enough to qualify. How will you run computer Science course with Management and Hindi qualified candidates?

    The final qualifying criterion for lectureship was not changed before declaration of result in previous exams (like June’2011 & December’2011). Minimum marks given in the notifications were taken as final cut-off for lectureship. This time (June 2012), the final qualifying criteria got raised to 65%, 60% and 55% for General, OBC and SC/ST respectively.

    Average number of candidates passed from 10 subjects only. And, huge number of candidates has failed from remaining 60 subjects. These candidates were punished by raising cut-off for all subjects.

    Do you want to show that candidates in other subjects are not efficient, & the candidates of only 6 subjects are intelligent? No subjects are equal, we all know that. Then how can we have same cut off marks for all the subjects? It is the mistake of UGC because UGC has set very easy question papers for 6 subjects, average standard question papers for 10 subjects and very tough standard question papers for remaining subjects.

    UGC-NET June’2012 result does not fulfill the requirements of all subjects. It only fulfills the requirements of subjects like Management and Hindi only. Unfairly raising cut-off mark to 65% has raised the no. of candidates passing from these two subjects only (nearly 30% of 43957 candidates). But less than 1% of candidates passed from 55 subjects due to last minute change of cut-off marks. For Lectureship, so far, UGC used the same cut-off marks as given in its notifications; it never changed its cut-off marks at the last minute except June 2012.

    Please do not punish other subject candidates for Management and Hindi subject candidates.
    Please do not punish the candidates for the mistakes committed by the UGC. Please do not change the cut-off marks before declaration of result, in favor of few subjects only. It is insult to every citizen who is willing to work in education sector.

    UGC being such a reputed body can devise a better procedure without favoring just few subjects.

    Another point I wish to raise is:
    If there are wrong questions in the question paper, then it is mistake of UGC & not students. Such question should not be marked as unevaluated. UGC must award grace marks for such questions. UGC must accept its mistakes and award full marks against wrong questions. All entrance exams of various universities follow this criterion.

    Many say, approach High Court to get justice for this grievance. But, we believe you, you all are well educated and will take right actions. The Court is not the first solution provider, it is the last one. We believe that the educationists may commit error, but immediately will correct it, when it brought to their notice.

    Please do not harass us; it will make us loose faith. We are the victims & only we know the pain we are going through.

    We all believe, you will look into this matter & the results will be corrected immediately.


    with kind regards,

    R N Indoria
    Sr. Library Information Assistant,
    Technical Division,
    Mahatma Gandhi Central Library,
    IIT Roorkee(UK).
    Phone No. 01332 – 284232 (O)
    01332 – 284673 (R)
    E-mail: write2rni@gmail.com,
    indoria_ram@rediffmail.com

    [Reply]

    sarangsukumar Reply:

    i clearly agree with u sir, UGC should at least do an analysis on the published result, and should go for different cut off percentages for different subjects, so as to make sure that almost equal percentage of people are clearing the NET. Otherwise its really injustice the for the peoples from computer science and etc where the pass percentage is only .4%. Isn’t it ridiculous?

    [Reply]

    debjit Reply:

    My view is different in this regard. All questions were MCQs..so either u get full marks or get zero…in case of descriptive type, different cut-off marks could have been considered for different subjects…..
    However India is a democratic country and everybody has right to express his/her views..and I respect your view also.

    [Reply]

    RJ Reply:

    Dear Mr Indoria,

    Your effort in highlighting the result scenario with facts and numbers deserves great appreciation. However, I would like to present few points which u have neglected in your analysis.
    Firstly, Changes in the NET June 2012 examination. Complete objective examination with no negative marking ( for the first time). No wonder that number of students who appeared in NET June 2012 increased to 5,71,627 from 2,65,930 in NET Dec 2011.
    Second, Criteria of lectureship, “Criteria would be declared before the declaration of the result”. This line features in all the UGC NET notification till date. Similarly, the qualifying criteria ( for Gen category) has always remained at 50% and was never tampered with. But, it was always in the hands of UGC to exercise their option to alter the criteria. It is sad, but true, that they did make use of that option this time.
    Though, the result and the criteria came on the same date, it would not have made any difference had the criteria been declared before the declaration of the result. The real difference would have been, had the criteria been declared before the examination which, for practical reasons, is not possible.
    Six subjects have 55% of the qualified candidates. But real picture can only be analyzed if we have the number of candidates appearing in each subject. I think more number of candidates appearing in these six subjects would have resulted in more qualification.
    I agree with you that UGC should not have a common qualifying criteria for all the subjects but it would be a more controversial and legally questionable situation to set different criteria based on extent of syllabus, difficulty level of paper, number of candidates and other parameters.
    The common qualifying criteria in an objective examination for non-science subjects is, according to me, the most unbiased way of assessment . Of course, one cannot compare science or mathematical subjects (which require solving a question and then marking an answer) to any other subjects, in time bound situations, but then UGC NET does not have any science subjects.
    With respect to wrong questions, there is no doubt that students should not be punished for the mistakes committed by UGC. Students should be awarded full marks allotted to the question unlike this time where the questions are cancelled.
    I sincerely hope that UGC devise a plan to conduct the future examinations without any controversy and complications.

    -Regards,
    RJ

    PS: I am not a NET aspirant nor a UGC official. Just tried to analyse the whole situation. The figures mentioned in the mail are taken from information sources within the public domain.

    [Reply]

    PRITI Reply:

    Agree

    [Reply]

  20. only high court of state provide us justice against ugc injustice think

    [Reply]

  21. delhi high court main hin kuchh ho sakta hai plz cont me 09013743674 rajeev jnu delhi

    [Reply]

  22. K. Arun Venkatesh says:

    Hi everyone,

    I formally agree that your problems should be heard of and solved. But in this article, it is stated that, “File a case in the Delhi High Court as UGC comes under Delhi Court’s jurisdiction. As soon as the case is accepted, appeal for a stay order on UGC’s working on the NET results.” This is unfair. I have passed in the subject of Electronics with exactly 60% in OBC quota. I am the only person qualified NET in Electronics in Tamilnadu. All my friends who have written the exams failed. I feel bad for them. But You should not drag our legs. You must fight for your rights. Even my friends are planning for some steps. I request everyone not to obtain stay order for the results. Let them give us the certificates. Getting a stay order for the results and stopping the entire process of issuance of certificates is not good.

    [Reply]

    Jagadish Hudagi Reply:

    brother your we are happy that you scored 60% what if you would have scored 59.99% is it OK that if you are stated that you are not qualified. think of all the others future.

    [Reply]

    vibha Reply:

    mr jagdish i think you really want to show off by saying that all your friend failed while you qualified the exam.if you are so intelligent then why obc quota, go for general 65% marks.why dont you support common for all policy i.e 65%.

    [Reply]

  23. sir pls help me i got 57.65% in ugc net exam…………….i am obc

    [Reply]

    Satish Kumar Sharma Reply:

    Same problem with me. What will I do? I belong to UP. Mo. No 08018376621

    [Reply]

  24. My % in NET 2012 is 64.94. My subject is English and i am of gen category. My % has come down to 64.94 and missed the NET because of the cancellation of one question by ugc as it was faulty. Will ugc do justice to me? My no is 09864785472

    [Reply]

    anonymous Reply:

    faulty means total becomes 348

    [Reply]

  25. Neelam Bansal says:

    There is a serious mistake in NET June,2012 resut.It is as follows(my roll no.15090048)-
    1- In my optional subject Education(code 09) paper-lll ,question no.37 is not evaluated and as my correct answers ,as per UGC, are 113 and UGC evaluated the correct answers out of 174(175-1) and so came my %64.94 and I am not included in the list of successful candidates for the lectureship as my % is below 65% fixed by UGC.
    2-Further, in optional subject Management(code 17) two questions each in paper –ll(question no.2 & 4) and paper-lll (question no.38 &74) are not evaluated .So, in subject Management total correct answers are evaluated against 171 (175-4)questions. In the same way, in optional Philosophy (code-03) two questions in paper-ll (question no.44 &50) and one question in paper-lll (question no.21) are not evaluated .So, in subject Philosophy total correct answers are evaluated against 172(175-3)questions. This resulted in candidates ,whose correct answers are 112 or 113 scoring 65% and above and thus clearing the test. Examples are
    A-Roll no-01170099 (Gauri Varshney) subject Management. She secured 65.50%.Her correct answers are 112 and % is calculated as 112×100/171.It is equal to 65.497% rounded off to 65.50%.
    B-Roll no.01170034 (M Ahsan Sadiq)subject Management.He secured 66.08%.His correct answers are 113 and % is calculated as 113×100/171.It is equal to 66.08%.
    C-Roll no.02030022 (JAGRITI RAI) subject Philosophy.She secured 65.12%.Her correct answers are 112 and % is calculated as 112×100/172.It is equal to 65.116 rounded off to 65.12%.

    D-Roll no.02030012 (MANSHA PANDEY) subject Philosophy. She secured 65.70% .Her correct answers are 113 and % is calculated as 113×100/172.It is equal to 65.697 rounded off to 65.70%.
    So, candidates of general category in subjects Philosophy (code-03) and Management (code -17) cleared the lecturership test with 112 or 113 correct answers but the students of the other subjects i.e. Education(code-09) failed even after 113 correct answers as is the case of mine.Can it be possible ,the score is same or less but the candidates of some subjects are declared successful and candidates of other subjects are declared failed? Questions not evaluated is the matter of UGC and the candidates could not be penalized for that. How UGC can fail a candidate even if he/ she is scoring at par and above with other successful candidates?

    [Reply]

    Ankur Reply:

    Neelam please contact me I have also got 64.94. We are sailing in the same boat. I am filing a case against UGC regarding this. 9896445121.
    Ankur Chhabra
    Lecturer in English

    [Reply]

  26. From Chandigarh
    My NET % is 63.75 in Management. It’s really disappointing to see injustice done to thousands of students like us. UGC must revise the eligibility criteria and issue fresh list of candidates selected for JRF & Lectrshp.
    Anyone frm CHD approached High Court??
    Please contact me on 9878922731

    [Reply]

    N. Sharma Reply:

    m from amritsar, punjab.. economics field…i got 60.76% aggregate..bt i dint clear…m really disappointed on dis,..

    [Reply]

    nisha Reply:

    same here. i am a student of economics i got 64.37 percent but not clear

    [Reply]

    A.K.SOOD Reply:

    I have got 64.91% In Management. I too want to take up matter in High Court.Contact 09357831457.

    [Reply]

    A.K.SOOD Reply:

    I have also got 64.91% in UGC Net 2012 in Management stream. I have written following two letters to UGC. You may also pursue your case on these lines.
    A.K. SOOD

    Request For Ractification Of My UGC NET June-2012 Result. Roll No-48171250.
    Ashwini Sood ashwinisood@gmail.com

    Oct 4

    to webmaster
    Respecte Sir,

    1) I had appeared for UGC NET June-2012 test under the roll no.
    48171250. My stream was Management (code-17).

    2) In the result declared by UGC NET authorities, my roll no. does not
    appear in the list of successful candidates.

    3) In the marks list loaded by UGC, I have been shown having scored
    following percentage of marks in above test:

    Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    64.00% 70.83% 61.64 64.91%

    4) There is another candidate, under roll no. 48171248 ( named-MONIKA
    THIND)having the same stream of Management,( Code-17), who has scored
    the same aggregate percentage of marks i.e.64.91%,in mark list loaded
    byUGC and has been declared as a successfull candidate. The details
    are furnished below:-

    Paper-I Paper-II
    Paper-III Aggregate
    60.00% 70.83% 64.38% 64.91%

    5) Since, I have scored the same aggregate percentage of marks ie
    64.91%, as above candidate, therefor, as a matter of justice, I may
    also be placed in list of successful candidate, in the same manner, as
    above candidate has been placed,in above test.You will appreciate that
    there cannot be two differnet critarias of UGC, for two
    diffrentcandidates having scored the same aggregate percentage.

    6) Regarding Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III I have scored much high
    percentage than the criteria fixed for these Papers by UGC and also
    meet the qualifying criteria.

    7) In view of the facts and as a matter of justice, it is requested
    that my result of UGC NET June-2012 ,may be rectified and I may also
    be placed in the list of successful candidates,like other candidates,
    having scored same aggregate percentage of marks like me, i.e.64.91%.

    Thanking You,

    Yours Sincerly,

    Ashwani Kumar sood

    Request For Reconsideration Of My UGC NET June-2012 Result. Roll No-48171250
    Ashwini Sood ashwinisood@gmail.com

    Sep 29

    to webmaster
    Respected Sir,

    1) I had appeared for UGC NET June-2012 test under the roll no. 48171250. My stream was Management (code-17).

    2) In the result declared by UGC NET authorities, my roll no. does not appear in the list of successful candidates.

    3) For general category candidates, the criteria set by UGC for qualifying above test for Lectureship is as under:

    Category Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    General 40% 40% 50% 65%

    4) I am a general category candidate and in marks list loaded by UGC, I have been shown having scored following percentage of marks in above test:

    Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    64.00% 70.83% 61.64% 64.91%

    5) It would be observed from above that I have scored much higher percentage than qualifying percentage in all three papers i.e. Paper-1, Paper-2 and Paper-3 and also meet the qualifying criteria.

    6) In aggregate of percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3, I have scored 65.49%, i.e. if we add together the percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3 and divide it by 3. [(64%+70.83%+61.64%) /3]=65.49%,which is higher than the qualifying criteria fixed by UGC.

    7) In the detailed mark list uploaded by UGC NET authorities, my percentage of marks scored has been shown as 64.91% which is not acceptable, as UGC has neither made known the aggregate of the marks scored , nor the total aggregate marks, from which this percentage has been worked out. I presume (on the basis of revised answer key uploaded by UGC) that my percentage has been worked out from 342 marks and I having been scored 222 marks.

    8) If, this is the case, even then, I have scored. 222 marks, which are the same number of the marks, which are required out of 342 marks to be eligible to qualify the above test But due to mathematical error, while working out the percentage it works out to be 64.91%, fractionally less than 65%, mainly due to mathematical error, , which needs to be ignored.

    9) In view of facts submitted in foregoing paras, I would request you to reconsider my result and place me in the list of candidates having successfully cleared UGC NET June-2012 test and a certificate may also be issued confirming my clearing the above mentioned test.

    I shall be highly obliged by your early action.

    Thanking You,

    Yours Sincerely,

    Ashwani Kumar Sood
    Roll no.- 48171250 (UGC NET June-2012)

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz29unGqYmE

    [Reply]

    A.K.SOOD Reply:

    I have also got 64.91% in UGC Net 2012 in Management stream. I have written following two letters to UGC. You may also pursue your case on these lines.
    A.K. SOOD

    Request For Ractification Of My UGC NET June-2012 Result. Roll No-48171250.
    Ashwini Sood ashwinisood@gmail.com

    Oct 4

    to webmaster
    Respecte Sir,

    1) I had appeared for UGC NET June-2012 test under the roll no.
    48171250. My stream was Management (code-17).

    2) In the result declared by UGC NET authorities, my roll no. does not
    appear in the list of successful candidates.

    3) In the marks list loaded by UGC, I have been shown having scored
    following percentage of marks in above test:

    Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    64.00% 70.83% 61.64 64.91%

    4) There is another candidate, under roll no. 48171248 ( named-MONIKA
    THIND)having the same stream of Management,( Code-17), who has scored
    the same aggregate percentage of marks i.e.64.91%,in mark list loaded
    byUGC and has been declared as a successfull candidate. The details
    are furnished below:-

    Paper-I Paper-II
    Paper-III Aggregate
    60.00% 70.83% 64.38% 64.91%

    5) Since, I have scored the same aggregate percentage of marks ie
    64.91%, as above candidate, therefor, as a matter of justice, I may
    also be placed in list of successful candidate, in the same manner, as
    above candidate has been placed,in above test.You will appreciate that
    there cannot be two differnet critarias of UGC, for two
    diffrentcandidates having scored the same aggregate percentage.

    6) Regarding Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III I have scored much high
    percentage than the criteria fixed for these Papers by UGC and also
    meet the qualifying criteria.

    7) In view of the facts and as a matter of justice, it is requested
    that my result of UGC NET June-2012 ,may be rectified and I may also
    be placed in the list of successful candidates,like other candidates,
    having scored same aggregate percentage of marks like me, i.e.64.91%.

    Thanking You,

    Yours Sincerly,

    Ashwani Kumar sood

    Request For Reconsideration Of My UGC NET June-2012 Result. Roll No-48171250
    Ashwini Sood ashwinisood@gmail.com

    Sep 29

    to webmaster
    Respected Sir,

    1) I had appeared for UGC NET June-2012 test under the roll no. 48171250. My stream was Management (code-17).

    2) In the result declared by UGC NET authorities, my roll no. does not appear in the list of successful candidates.

    3) For general category candidates, the criteria set by UGC for qualifying above test for Lectureship is as under:

    Category Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    General 40% 40% 50% 65%

    4) I am a general category candidate and in marks list loaded by UGC, I have been shown having scored following percentage of marks in above test:

    Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    64.00% 70.83% 61.64% 64.91%

    5) It would be observed from above that I have scored much higher percentage than qualifying percentage in all three papers i.e. Paper-1, Paper-2 and Paper-3 and also meet the qualifying criteria.

    6) In aggregate of percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3, I have scored 65.49%, i.e. if we add together the percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3 and divide it by 3. [(64%+70.83%+61.64%) /3]=65.49%,which is higher than the qualifying criteria fixed by UGC.

    7) In the detailed mark list uploaded by UGC NET authorities, my percentage of marks scored has been shown as 64.91% which is not acceptable, as UGC has neither made known the aggregate of the marks scored , nor the total aggregate marks, from which this percentage has been worked out. I presume (on the basis of revised answer key uploaded by UGC) that my percentage has been worked out from 342 marks and I having been scored 222 marks.

    8) If, this is the case, even then, I have scored. 222 marks, which are the same number of the marks, which are required out of 342 marks to be eligible to qualify the above test But due to mathematical error, while working out the percentage it works out to be 64.91%, fractionally less than 65%, mainly due to mathematical error, , which needs to be ignored.

    9) In view of facts submitted in foregoing paras, I would request you to reconsider my result and place me in the list of candidates having successfully cleared UGC NET June-2012 test and a certificate may also be issued confirming my clearing the above mentioned test.

    I shall be highly obliged by your early action.

    Thanking You,

    Yours Sincerely,

    Ashwani Kumar Sood
    Roll no.- 48171250 (UGC NET June-2012)

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz29uoFtBYg

    [Reply]

  27. Ranjeet kumar says:

    I m once canditate and secured 58.23% but still unqualified..it is really embarrassing and UGC should give reply to all suffered from injustice…

    [Reply]

  28. Breaking News!!! file your complaints about UGC NET June 2012

    Posted by Jomy Jose on October 9, 2012 at 14:39 in Discussion / News / Article

    Link:
    http://lislinks.com/forum/topics/breaking-news-file-your-complaints-about-ugc-net-june-2012

    Today i met Prof. M.M Ansari member of University Grants Commission. He told U.G.C have fixed a meeting on 22nd October for decision on the complaints, issues and grievances of the NET result declared on 18th September and Prof. Ved Prakash will come out with a proper reply to all the queries raised by educationist’s and candidates and would be publish publicly in UGC website and Newspapers on 23rd and 24th October.

    He requested all the affected candidates to write a mail to all the commission members, Prof Ved Praksah and Sh. Ashok Thakur (Head, NET Bureau) mentioning your issues so that they can be raised in meeting and commission members sit there with proper paper work.

    It’s my request, pls all the affected candidates do this work as soon as possible and write a mail to all the commission members listed below:

    1. Prof. Ved Prakash Chairman (Actg.) U.G.C
    2. Sh. Ashok Thakur, Head NET Bureau, secy.dhe@nic.in
    3. Prof Achyutananda Samanta, achyuta@kiit.ac.in
    4. Prof (Dr) Seyed E. Hasnain, seh@bioschool.iitd.ac.in
    5. Prof. Meenakshi Gopinath, meenug11@gmail.com
    6. Dr. Indu Shahani, sheriffofmumbai@gmail.com
    7. Prof. Yogendra Yadav, yogendra.yadav@csds.in
    8. Prof. D. Narasimha Reddy, reddydn@gmail.com

    Pls do it for common cause..
    (Source Akhil Kumar
    http://www.facebook.com/groups/156942054445283/)

    for recent updates from Kerala pls join
    http://www.facebook.com/groups/156942054445283/

    for recent updates in Kerala Highcourt case of Ugc net June 2012 visit……….
    http://www.facebook.com/groups/156942054445283
    http://www.protestagainstugc.blogspot.in/

    hav a 9c day a head!!!!

    common my dear friends……..Go & use above mention link ,
    also share your views regarding the same.

    try to contect & collect more person from the different subject field if they not qualified NET JUNE 12 .
    if the no. of person come & join together then they’ ll able to put some more pressure to UGC to Change their Decision to down the cut merit NET RESULT June 12.

    also go to court in their state & file the case…. then we shall win!!!!!!!!!!!!

    hope we all win this battle against !!!!!!!!

    Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    [Reply]

    Shekhara Reply:

    i wrote letter to all given mail id. yogendra yadav mail id, having error

    [Reply]

  29. dear Manpreet

    kindly contect Mr. Solanki
    09882225371

    [Reply]

  30. Definately Its the time for us to battle for justice !
    1)ugc result has never been increased to such a extent that extent that is 15%
    2) The result not only subject specific It is also state ….Region specific
    3)Above to ALL we ALL belived that we have prepared and wrote exam on the basis of minimun eligibility criteria because result qualifying criteria has never been increased to such a extend
    4)who has passed based on the first eligibilty criteria has to be qualified in this 2012 without any discrimination
    5)whatever may be the changes let them do on the next exam orelse the entire exam has to cancelled that is june net 2012………..because it may favour the persons who has cleard and definately who has loosed has to struggle for new complications and tough valutions and cuttoff in forecoming exams
    let us battle ……rise awake untill the goal is reached

    [Reply]

  31. RAKESH KUMAR says:

    I m a candidate from Bihar who scored 59% from general category. Whom to be contacted for joining in the case at high court/apex court

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz28t3m5cnO

    [Reply]

  32. dear professionals !!!

    It’s my humble request to all of you…

    kindly send their roll no with marks ( scan copy of your OMR Sheets & Addmission card) & give few suggestions to UGC NET Authorities which you want to change in UGC NET results June 12 to above mention addresses through email mail before 22 Oct 2012…

    also share it to others professional( in different fields) & promote to do the same.

    come on hurry up!!!!!

    forward it to others E-mail ID or facebook links… for general Interest.

    it the time to change old pattern & views…………..

    [Reply]

    Satish Kumar Sharma Reply:

    Help me Sir.
    Mo. No. 08018376621

    [Reply]

  33. Is there anyone from Tamil nadu filed a case? I discussed with lawyer and planning to file in Chennai Highcout. Let me know if anyone interested to join with me?

    [Reply]

    thiru Reply:

    yes

    [Reply]

    SAJITHA V Reply:

    Dear Sumy,

    I had written the exam in Chennai, I would like to join with you to file the case. Pls let me know more details. Contact number 9171726686

    [Reply]

  34. Jagadish Hudagi says:

    I wrote a letter to all mail ID’s mentioned above. its totally unfair from the UGC to increase the cut off like any thing they must see the normal standard for mass of candidates. we are stabbed we have to fight.

    [Reply]

    Gururaj B.L Reply:

    hi Jagadish, what process is going on ?

    [Reply]

  35. Gururaj B.L says:

    I also got 53 % where i cleared 3 papers above the mentioned marks by UGC but I felt bad that even we score more than actual marks. We will also support and there are 25 candidates they also have the same problem i will defineatly inform to them to join. Go head boss we with u. Even i agree that it is not a competitive exam to make cutoff. Nice going we also with u.

    [Reply]

    vinai K Reply:

    Dear friends
    I am unhappy about UGC NET June 2012 result, cause as per notification they didn’t the declare results,.
    I Know we have to sit and study again clear the UGC NET.
    One side this is bad for us, But another it’s better
    I said its good result! do you know why?
    why they did like this
    Just think:
    If result declared as per notification
    1) There will be a More than 1.5 lakh candidates clear the UGC NET
    a) this create huge competition at the time of recruiting lectures for degree colleges, again we have to write competitive exams like CET. It leads to corruptions, who having money and influence, will be succeed and qualified candidate will be victimed

    2) UGC NET having value . If declared result as per notification, There will be a no value for UGC NET. and again UGC may make Ph.D will compulsory for degree lecturers
    Therefore my opinion is
    Instead of wasting your time and energy on writ petition or court case, if you can channelize it towards your coveted goal, it would do well to all of you. Success and failure are two sides of the same coin. In this world many miss the opportunity just for that 0.1%. But accept it with sportsmanship. Changing the
    criterion is always with the higher authority. We should be prepared for the best out of us. If not now …May be tomorrow or tomorrow.
    If any words hurt you please sorry friends
    I am not a UGC official. Just tried to analyse the whole situation.
    Your friend
    vinayak

    [Reply]

  36. Anonymous says:

    Instead of wasting your time and energy on writ petition or court case, if you can channelize it towards your coveted goal, it would do good to all of you. Success and failure are two sides of the same coin. In this world many miss the opportunity just for that 0.1%. But accept it with sportsmanship. Changing the criterion is always with the higher authority. We should be prepared for the best out of us. If not now ….may be tomorrow or tomorrow.

    [Reply]

  37. Deepak jadhav says:

    I also with u.i m from sc categary i have allready secured 55% and qualify net.but this new criteria is unjust for students because ugc is not proving directly to them how can they keep merit for this,so this really unjust & harassment

    [Reply]

  38. Deepak jadhav says:

    I also with u.i m from sc categary i have allready secured 55% and qualify net.but this new criteria is unjust for students because ugc is not proving JOBS directly to them how can they keep merit for this,so this really unjust & harassment

    [Reply]

  39. lalji daniel says:

    Send request for help to all M.Ps and union ministers. Shashi Tharoor replied me that he would take up the matter with UGC. Try to get the email address of all MPs and central ministers and send emails.

    [Reply]

    Karun S.dave Reply:

    Dear Lalji,
    If you have the email ids of the above mentioned ,pl post them here.thanx.

    [Reply]

  40. Sir,
    I appeared in the UGC NET June 2012 exam held on 24-06-2012 for the Management subject and scored 64.91% as a GENERAL category candidate. I have some objections to the UGC’s decision regarding change in answers and cancellation of questions while declaring the result. My objections are on following grounds;

    1. No reasons were given for changing answers of the questions.
    2. No reasons were given for cancelling the questions.
    3. While cancelling the questions no compensation was given for time spent on answering these questions.
    4. I have strong objection for cancelling following question;

    Paper 3 (Management subject)
    Ques NO 38. Match the following:
    List-I List-II
    (i) Z – Theory (a) Hergberg
    (ii) Y – Theory (b) Maslow
    (iii) Hierarchy Needs Theory (c) Mc Gregor
    (iv) Hygiene Theory (d) Urwick

    Ans Codes:
    (a) (b) (c) (d)
    (A) (iv) (i) (iii) (ii)
    (B) (iii) (ii) (iv) (i)
    (C) (iv) (iii) (ii) (i)
    (D) (iii) (iv) (i) (ii)

    Remark:
    1. In multiple choice questions only best possible answer can be taken as correct answer.
    2. In above question only possible answer among the alternate choice is ‘C’.
    3. None of the combinations other than choice ‘C’ is possible.
    4. Neither A, nor B nor D can be correct in any way and hence can not be correct answer.
    5. Therefore only ‘C’ option stands correct out of the given choices.

    [Reply]

    A.K.SOOD Reply:

    I have also got 64.91% in UGC Net 2012 in Management stream. I have written following two letters to UGC. You may also pursue your case on these lines.
    A.K. SOOD

    Request For Ractification Of My UGC NET June-2012 Result. Roll No-48171250.
    Ashwini Sood ashwinisood@gmail.com

    Oct 4

    to webmaster
    Respecte Sir,

    1) I had appeared for UGC NET June-2012 test under the roll no.
    48171250. My stream was Management (code-17).

    2) In the result declared by UGC NET authorities, my roll no. does not
    appear in the list of successful candidates.

    3) In the marks list loaded by UGC, I have been shown having scored
    following percentage of marks in above test:

    Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    64.00% 70.83% 61.64 64.91%

    4) There is another candidate, under roll no. 48171248 ( named-MONIKA
    THIND)having the same stream of Management,( Code-17), who has scored
    the same aggregate percentage of marks i.e.64.91%,in mark list loaded
    byUGC and has been declared as a successfull candidate. The details
    are furnished below:-

    Paper-I Paper-II
    Paper-III Aggregate
    60.00% 70.83% 64.38% 64.91%

    5) Since, I have scored the same aggregate percentage of marks ie
    64.91%, as above candidate, therefor, as a matter of justice, I may
    also be placed in list of successful candidate, in the same manner, as
    above candidate has been placed,in above test.You will appreciate that
    there cannot be two differnet critarias of UGC, for two
    diffrentcandidates having scored the same aggregate percentage.

    6) Regarding Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III I have scored much high
    percentage than the criteria fixed for these Papers by UGC and also
    meet the qualifying criteria.

    7) In view of the facts and as a matter of justice, it is requested
    that my result of UGC NET June-2012 ,may be rectified and I may also
    be placed in the list of successful candidates,like other candidates,
    having scored same aggregate percentage of marks like me, i.e.64.91%.

    Thanking You,

    Yours Sincerly,

    Ashwani Kumar sood

    Request For Reconsideration Of My UGC NET June-2012 Result. Roll No-48171250
    Ashwini Sood ashwinisood@gmail.com

    Sep 29

    to webmaster
    Respected Sir,

    1) I had appeared for UGC NET June-2012 test under the roll no. 48171250. My stream was Management (code-17).

    2) In the result declared by UGC NET authorities, my roll no. does not appear in the list of successful candidates.

    3) For general category candidates, the criteria set by UGC for qualifying above test for Lectureship is as under:

    Category Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    General 40% 40% 50% 65%

    4) I am a general category candidate and in marks list loaded by UGC, I have been shown having scored following percentage of marks in above test:

    Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
    64.00% 70.83% 61.64% 64.91%

    5) It would be observed from above that I have scored much higher percentage than qualifying percentage in all three papers i.e. Paper-1, Paper-2 and Paper-3 and also meet the qualifying criteria.

    6) In aggregate of percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3, I have scored 65.49%, i.e. if we add together the percentage of Paper-1,Paper-2 and Paper-3 and divide it by 3. [(64%+70.83%+61.64%) /3]=65.49%,which is higher than the qualifying criteria fixed by UGC.

    7) In the detailed mark list uploaded by UGC NET authorities, my percentage of marks scored has been shown as 64.91% which is not acceptable, as UGC has neither made known the aggregate of the marks scored , nor the total aggregate marks, from which this percentage has been worked out. I presume (on the basis of revised answer key uploaded by UGC) that my percentage has been worked out from 342 marks and I having been scored 222 marks.

    8) If, this is the case, even then, I have scored. 222 marks, which are the same number of the marks, which are required out of 342 marks to be eligible to qualify the above test But due to mathematical error, while working out the percentage it works out to be 64.91%, fractionally less than 65%, mainly due to mathematical error, , which needs to be ignored.

    9) In view of facts submitted in foregoing paras, I would request you to reconsider my result and place me in the list of candidates having successfully cleared UGC NET June-2012 test and a certificate may also be issued confirming my clearing the above mentioned test.

    I shall be highly obliged by your early action.

    Thanking You,

    Yours Sincerely,

    Ashwani Kumar Sood
    Roll no.- 48171250 (UGC NET June-2012)

    [Reply]

  41. sociology p3 qsn no 45 me X ka symbol hai jab maine ugc se pucha to btaya gya ki is qsn ka koi marks nhi diya gya hai.mujhe marks 59.20% hai or main OBC me aata hu. lagvag savi subject me isperkar ki problem hai .isse 1 qsn kam solve krne k liye mila.UGC ki galti k karan hjaro students ka future andhkar ho gya hai. hum savi ko milkar janhit yachika ,rti dalni chahiye.
    7631571853

    [Reply]

  42. i m subhash 4m bhagalpur. i m agree with u. my cont no 7631571853

    [Reply]

  43. Dhanesh Kumar K says:

    Dear All,

    Happy to know that a collective effort is there. we need t o go in full swing for getting justice, Considerable increase in the aggregate without prior information is not justifiable. Aggregate mark has to be revised more logically an reasonably. 60% for the Gen category is OK. Pls. let us know the developments. Hope UGC will be kind enough to consider our fervent appeal favourably

    Dhanesh Kumar – Kerala
    9846577277

    [Reply]

    Karun S.dave Reply:

    Dear Dhanesh Kumar K,
    Why do you think that 60% is OK now? May be because you have scored somewhere around this,right? There are thousands who are affected by this injustice.So pl stick to the figure of 50% ,as declared by UGC at the time of notification.There has to be no cut off criteria at all .Everyone who scored above the 50% mark should be declared qualified. There should be no negotiations on this ground.

    [Reply]

  44. dear ALL,

    Recently i took up a exam set in tamilnadu ………questions where much harder than ugc net in management so if we dont get justice we may have to struggle a lotin future so please move forward for justice ……………………… for JRF its reasonable to raise the cuttoff because cost is involved in it but why such a cutt off for lectureship?

    [Reply]

  45. hello freinds

    nice 2 see ur positive reply to file the case against ugc
    &
    also send email to ugc authorities as above mentioned addresses..

    please contact to their friends or the persons who are effected through this decision made by ugc net result 2012.

    please see & follow few face book group..

    “Hands On Movement Against Injustice in UGC NET 2012 Result ”

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hands-On-Movement-Against-Injustice-in-UGC-NET-2012-Result/142309879248566?ref=ts&fref=ts

    [Reply]

  46. SIVANANDHAN.S says:

    PLEASE DO SOME THING ABOUT AGAINST UGC RESULTS.

    [Reply]

  47. Sir,i got 59.43% in apset and i belong to bc.so please orderapset to qualify me(in english subject)

    subject)

    [Reply]

    ashok bc 1930202 Reply:

    marks 59.77% subject english u r not alone sir. keep updating

    [Reply]

  48. sir,a.p.set is following u r instrucions.so plz reduce ugc cutoff and pass the prosses to apset.plz sir i worked as possible as i can.we can not again pay the fee and can not pay that much of concentration on subject again and again.hence concider my requestwith tender heart.

    [Reply]

  49. Sanjeev Kumar Bansal says:

    ugc net is only eligibility test not competitive test to make merit, they are not appointing us anywhere, it is like CTET ………………
    the ugc net test eligibilty should be around 55% marks, as 55% marks in pg are required to fill the net form.
    file a case immediately, there must be negative marking…..

    [Reply]

  50. Sanjeev Kumar Bansal says:

    subject-wise result must be declared, management students won the whole race that is unfair, revise the result soon…

    [Reply]

  51. My doubt is that whether court will take a favorable decision in this regard because the NET June 2012 notification itself had a mention in the scheme and date of examination section that

    “Only such candidates who obtain the minimum required marks in each Paper, separately, as mentioned above, will be considered for final preparation of result.

    However, the final qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) and Eligibility for Lectureship shall be decided by UGC before declaration of result.”

    Let me give the link to that webpage for reference

    http://ugcnetonline.in/sch_o_test.php

    [Reply]

  52. Don’t cheat students

    [Reply]

  53. The dee cision should be taken before the next notification of net or else it would be very difficult to move oour case

    [Reply]

  54. TNSET which i attended on oct 7th was very tough and i got 60% in NET JUNE 2012 where i need 65% for General category.. (commerce) Kindly inform me about the progress in this issue..

    [Reply]

    thiru Reply:

    yes true

    [Reply]

  55. Sir we r all very eager for u r favourble decision.

    [Reply]

  56. any progress in fight against ugc about result when process will start pls tell me i am from karnataka and pls tell me how i join in this fight

    [Reply]

    Mastan Reply:

    please tell me the way to join

    [Reply]

  57. arup jana says:

    It is not fare so change the decision. and withdrwan the june 2012 result and reproduced result and submit in your websites. right to equality so aggregate result standing in to the 55% – 60% within. so alever happy.

    [Reply]

  58. We have decided to sit Satyagraha in front of Secretariat,Thiruvanathapuram (Kerala) on 20th October(Saturday).Please reach main gate of Secretatiat at 10am.9946992356

    [Reply]

  59. Titto sunny says:
  60. Sir,Stick on to ur former promise.

    [Reply]

  61. neha agarwal says:

    the hearing in kerela is scheduled on the 30th of october…. do you suggest we file another case/ petition from delhi now??

    [Reply]

    kumari arti Reply:

    ya if u r going to file plz contact me on my id artibhartiya007@gmail.com.
    i am with u

    [Reply]

  62. ya.. surely

    you can……….it !!

    if we file case against UGC in different high cout then we can able to create more presure on them….

    keep it up my friend…

    today breaking news ….

    Kerala’s chief Minister wrote a letter to Mr. Kapil Sibble, HRD Minister regarding this..

    Kindly seethe link :

    http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/chandy-writes-to-kapil-sibal/article4008109.ece

    [Reply]

  63. Many Self finance colleges are now affiliiated with Unversity ( approved by UGC).
    It is known that such colleges are not getting net passed lecturers candidate as per Norms.
    But colleges runs.
    Lecturers serving in such colleges ( with failure in net ) are given only 20 to 25 % of sallary .

    I would like to request UGC here to reduce there passing criteria and provide more net qualified lecturer to society and nation . so this lecturer can obtain more sallary from their finance college and being satisfied he/she will serve nation through teaching with much and more interest.

    [Reply]

    hitesh Reply:

    This is the real story. Result passing hurdles are not beneficial to nation.
    In the interst of nation UGC must remove aggregate passing criteria.
    This will be real Bhakti & seva to Eduaction of India ( which has got the corrosion from self finance colleges)

    [Reply]

    twinkle Reply:

    I appreciate Kirit and Hitesh statement psted recently
    Another thing is…
    How criteria can be justified that this year 65 % next year 70% and next year 45%.
    Why u are not taking pre test to prepare quality question paper – Item analysis .
    If u are not getting correct answer from paper setter or moderator then why u are not expelling them from your team.
    how u can play with keys – this is the key and this is the modified key and this is the final key.
    i think u are all football players june 2012 and your ball is net exam. kicking this and that way no one will trust the exam. u r playing with money of nation . i think ugc will become the richest unit of government by getting more fee declaring few pass.

    [Reply]

  64. this matter has to be taken seriously …………. i am going to write a mail to narendra moli gujarat chief ………………………..please rise this to opposite party so thay can rise questions about this big cheating ……………………and publish in all press ……………… whatever may be the eligibility criteria let them fix and do on the next exam or else thay should not conduct exam for few years

    [Reply]

  65. vikas gupta says:

    i m very thankful u i m general candidate. i could not believe on that.
    ugc is cheater. it means it may be ugc can 75 % or more cut off in next exam result.

    [Reply]

  66. Plz make for us gud thing…

    [Reply]

  67. Ranjana Jadhav says:

    On what basis UGC has decided the qualifying criteria? Whatever the criteria it should be declared at the time of Exam. Notification . For e.g. for admission process of any affiliated course it is always declared in admission notification that how many seats are available , on that basis cut off marks are declared.
    UGC must have declared in exam. notification. It is unfair to declare it at the time of result, where as eligibility criteria is 50%.

    [Reply]

  68. D.j.prasad says:

    Wat decision was taken
    today’s meeting sir?

    [Reply]

  69. D.j.prasad says:

    Wat sir why don’t u give reply Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ?

    [Reply]

  70. Gururaj B.L says:

    whats that decision has taken in meeting please give us updates.

    [Reply]

  71. savita kure says:

    whats that decision has taken in meeting ? pl tell me.

    [Reply]

  72. Anonymous says:

    Why so much wasting of time over the result. So many others are anxiously waiting for the new ad and here UGC has not come up with the notification due to some protests.

    [Reply]

    Gururaj B.L Reply:

    boss have you cleared ha?

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    Boss I know one thing for sure that do not wait for some miracle to happen. Be prepared for the next move. And that exactly I do and request others also to do.

    [Reply]

    Suman Chakraborty Reply:

    keep your advice to yourself. we don’t need your advice. Better study for the interview for lectureship

    Anonymous Reply:

    Thanks for your advice. However I am already working as a lecturer and happy with the job. So need not study for any interview.

    Anonymous Reply:

    Instead of becoming so vitriolic try to be calm and think about the whole thing. If we read little more instead of waiting for a favorable reply it won’t do any harm. If the second list comes that would be really great. Nobody is angry or jealous of you. We are all students and are only known to each other by an imaginary bond. Let that be on friendly level.

    Suman Chakraborty Reply:

    I never meant to be vitriolic. Actually I said we are mature enough to decide what to do. So thank you for your advice. But remember we the victims of June 2012 NET are not raising our voice to get empanelled, but to protest against the irresponsible, whimsical, dictatorial attitude and indiscretion of ugc to ensure same thing never happen again.

  73. How many students were qualified in english subject sir?

    [Reply]

  74. mahendra s. kharat says:

    I waiting the decision of 22oct.2012 by u.g.c. on controversial issue of marks criteria. My roll no.50580828 and phone no.9860108419. I just join asst.professor and also declared passed in institute due to prior criteria. I waiting latest decision. I am very depressed now.

    [Reply]

  75. kumari arti says:

    the criteria should be declared before the exam not after the result this is totally cheating.
    plz help me to file a petition from delhi region

    [Reply]

    ANIL SAINI Reply:

    ready to help for filing case against ugc from delhi

    [Reply]

  76. Surbhi M.Pandya says:

    Iam also affected candidate and think that YGC should not do this type of injustice with the candidates .Ialso hope that UGC will take decision in the favour of candidates

    [Reply]

  77. No miracle is going to happen in our favour, its time for us to set ourselves tight for the next exam in December, Ugc won’t change its decision

    [Reply]

    thiru Reply:

    let me tell u one thing……………..govt has sanctioned govt post for more than 2000 candiates it was cancelled by appeling in court …………….so every individual has a right …………………see we should unite ourselfs in result……….by knowing that result will b based on all subject general cuttoff we wrote and earlier result was also prepared in that maner but today we are saying tht management , hind has cleared much iF people want to stick on to tht particular point they should have gone to the court before writting the exam………………….wat ugc has done inwat basis earlier results was given ……………it was completely changed today it is unfair cutt off (15% rise)which was not one ever before it has to corrected we have unitely fight for the same……………………

    [Reply]

    Gururaj B.L Reply:

    please do not lose hopes wait.

    [Reply]

  78. Miracle hoga.result will decleare very soon

    [Reply]

    vijay Reply:

    no miracle happens..we should prepare for dec exam

    [Reply]

    neha kudi Reply:

    Chance 100%

    [Reply]

  79. any progress any one tell me about meeting what happened wht will we do next

    [Reply]

  80. Hope UGC will change its descision

    [Reply]

  81. Dont lose faith priti. Even if nothing is going to happen in our favor ,we have to teach the ugc a lesson.The fact that the notification for ugc net for Dec2012 got delayed itself shows that we have won partly. What they did is not right. Together we can win. Support all those who are fighting against ugc. Never discourage them.There is a hearing in Kerala court on 30th .we will see what happens after that.Meanwhile I urge all others in different states to file a case and put maximum pressure on the ugc.

    [Reply]

  82. And by the way . Miracles do happen!

    [Reply]

  83. Suman Chakraborty says:

    I appeared in NET June 2012. My name and roll no are
    Suman Chakraborty and 12300087. In 3rd Paper I scored 56.76%. It means
    I have scored 85.14 out of 150. But my question is how can it be
    possible as the paper was set in objective mode and each question is
    of 2 marks. I can score either 84 or 86. can any one help me to find the answer. please tell me has any filed case in west bengal? plesae tell me present status of the court case and ugc decision after meeting on 22 nd october?

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    One question was not evaluated. So you got 84 out of 148. Thus you need to calculated that if I get 84 out of 148, then out of 100 how much?. YOu will get it as 56.756 i.e. 56.76. I hope I am of some help.

    [Reply]

    Suman Chakraborty Reply:

    thank you I have understood

    [Reply]

  84. M.Ramasamy says:

    ugc activity is very worst .suppose all students get full marks in all three papers at the time ugc cutoff revised or not..what can do ..so totally cancelled net exame. .Eligible is mphil is allowed..

    [Reply]

  85. Anonymous says:

    Why can’t I access UGC NET site?

    [Reply]

  86. the ugcnetonline unable access in the ugc net website, why?

    [Reply]

  87. Keep the flame burning.

    [Reply]

  88. Dear friends

    Recently, Mr. Sasi Tharoor has become HRD minister.Please once again remind him regarding our NET JUNE 2012 injustice done by UGC authorities.

    [Reply]

  89. I WANT TO SUE A CASE AGAINST UGC, PLEASE GIVE ME THE CONTACT NUMBERS OF THE ADVOCATES FROM KOTTAYAM, ERNAKULAM, TRIVANDRUM AND MUVATTUPUZHA.

    [Reply]

  90. anyone from Mumbai suing against UGC??

    [Reply]

  91. There are still several wrong answers in subject Education (code-09).Examples-
    Paper-2.Ques.no-49 -D (according to UGC B)
    Paper-3.Ques.no-10-A(C),14 -A(B),37-A,as per English version(cancelled),38-C(B),74-C(B).
    So candidates qualified on the basis of wrong answers.Need of the hour to re valuate the answers sheets again afresh ,so to reflect the correct result.

    [Reply]

  92. veena shukla says:

    Anybody can give information about Kerala high court decisions came on 30th October.

    [Reply]

  93. Anonymous says:

    Whenever anyone feels victimized, they only think of themselves as the victim of the arbitrary laws and so on. It’s fine, but at least for a while think about the next lot of students who want to appear for the exam. I for example cannot concentrate fully, because I feel, there is no notification as yet, what will be the new criterion ….. Because of unnecessary tension, there must be a lot of candidates who won’t be able to study properly and might miss the attempt due to incomplete studies. When such things happen at college level, what do we do? We just blame the institution, curse our bad luck and move on. If for each and every new criterion implemented you start feeling victimized of the new policy, the country can’t function properly. Everyone feels at one point or the other the sitting duck of the irrational and injudicious laws. But if we too start behaving irrationally it won’t serve any purpose. Taking morchas, having talk with the officials and signature campaign are the ways which won’t harm anyone. But when you knock the court’s door, please think before you act. Because of your impetuous action, lakhs of students are anxiously awaiting for the Dec. ad, which so far should have come long time ago. I feel frustrated and depressed with the whole system.

    [Reply]

    Rishav Reply:

    nothing works properly in this country!! and if we dnt knock d door of the court.. we wnt get justice!! its not about a single exam. this is happening every year!! even the so called transparency in the exam has been brought only after knocking the door of the court, for which so many are celebrating their success.. while most are being victimized. no one knows what ugc will do next!! coz to keep the standard in academics they are demoralising the aspirants!! previously 45 % (cz very few cud pass the exam) was more than enough to pass on, this year its 65% (cz too many have passed)!! its ridiculous!! next year it could be 95%… and the following yr it cud be 40% depending on how many are passing!! this is how they will maintain standard!! and i can challenge the fact that those who are setting the papers wont pass properly as per their own criteria!! coz they themselves dont know the proper answers!!

    just like you many are waiting for the next exam. i am also one of them!! if u r really aspiring to get thru it.. be serious in ur studies and concentrate!! dnt look around what is happening outside!! u do ur duty, and let others do theirs!!

    [Reply]

    PRITI Reply:

    YUP , WE DO HAVE TO PREPARE SINCERELY AS WHO KNOWS ————-THE CRITERIA NEXT TIME SHOOTS UP TO 95%

    [Reply]

    Neelam Reply:

    It appears that papers have been prepared by novices as
    1-There are several repeat questions in subject paper 2 & 3 .
    2-There are still wrong answers.
    3-Questions not evaluated at will by UGC. In Management subject two questions each in paper 2 &3 and in Philosophy two questions in paper 2 and one question in paper 3 not evaluated.Thus giving undue advantages to these subjects.
    4-There is more than one answers are correct.
    So,UGC has made the prestigious exam a joke.

    [Reply]

  94. Tks for giving your side of the story. But just pause for a minute and think if the lakhs of new students who wish to appear for Dec. exam are fine with the delay in notification and unnecessary tension created due to it because of the court case?

    [Reply]

    veena shukla Reply:

    students who want to concentrate for Dec. exam are free to concentrate on their preparation but why they have problems with those who are fighting for justice. Suppose such students are preparing for day & night and UGC again make a change in criteria for selection to reduce No. of qualifying students before declaration of exam, and set it on 80% aggregate they will also feel to be cheated. What will with them and their preparation in that situation. UGC also had made a number of flaws in answer keys, such students what think about this issue?

    [Reply]

  95. Anonymous says:

    As per the new notification the test will still be objective for all three papers. According to this notification paper III will be of 75 questions and will carry 150 marks. But if you click the syllabus key, it shows that the third paper will be of 200 marks and will be subjective. Can anyone clarify?

    [Reply]

  96. i kusum also gave the ugc net in the subject Education my roll number is 26090188 i got the aggregate 59.20 as per mark sheet declared by ugc in their website. i belong to general category so the criteria 65% aggregate to qualify net. its ok . But i want a answer that i have colleague who also gave ugc net exam in Education under roll number 48091218 aggregate as per ugc mark sheet is 55.23 and he also belongs to general category and the shocking news is that he qualified the ugc net as per result declared by ugc in their website what critetria they adopted to select him why i was not selected my marks is more them him.

    [Reply]

    Rishav Reply:

    i too know people with surnames “Chakraborty” and “Bhattacharya”.. belonging to General Category (since they are belong to the Bengali Brahmins) have qualified NET with less than 65%. Roll numbers 11300775 ( 61.49%) and 11300397 (58.62%).

    i dont know whether they belong to “PWD” category or not, in that case things are different.

    i will suggest that you clarify if ur colleague belongs to “PWD” or not!!

    [Reply]

  97. Suman Chakraborty says:

    ugc has declared a notice for December NET. This time again they have not fixed the qualifying marks ,which they mentioned, is subject to change. This shows how little they care for the public opinion. Again some farce is going to happen on the fate of December candidate. Who may say they may raise it to 90%. However regarding the the mistake about syllabus in the NET June 2012 notification, the have corrected themselves. This time the have clearly mentioned ” All questions of Paper-II and Paper-III will be compulsory, covering entire syllabus (including all electives, without options). ” This is should be stated in the notification of June 2012 NET. Thousands of students have been victimised for their careless attitude in June 2012 NET.

    [Reply]

  98. Vikash Kumar says:

    Hi all i had got an an aggregate of 57.23% in UGC NET june 2012 in Electronic science paper from GEN category. My roll no is 06880170. I have crossed the cutoff in all papers. But one thing i am not understanding is here i have seen posts of many people getting 60% to 64%. What i feeel if u people are good enough to get these much aggregate then next time in DEC u can easily cross 65%. People had already filed cases it will take time so better concentrate on DEC exam. About me i think i had not been selected. If UGC loses the case then good otherwise i am better enough to cross 65% in DEC exam.

    [Reply]

    vijay Reply:

    HELLO VIKASH
    YOU ARE 100% CORRECT. I AM VIJAYA CHANDRA and i secured 60.8% in june 2012 net exam. my subject is also ELECTRONIC SCIENCE. lets concentrate on dec 2012 exam. I WISH YOU ALL SUCCESS

    [Reply]

    PRITI Reply:

    hey buddy , u have cracked net

    [Reply]

    PRITI Reply:

    next time the merit will be subjectwise

    [Reply]

  99. dear si iam handicap
    student fi bhee mera name qualify list me nahi hai mera roll no15800420 june 2012 geography
    plz any suggest in my id shuklapramod121@gmail.com or my mob 9936628343 up

    [Reply]

  100. Attension Please:

    UGC had put supplementary result june 2012.check http://www.ugcnetonline.in .Aggregate is 65% itself changes like 64.5% have been round up to 65%..

    [Reply]

    neha kudi Reply:

    No most of the candidate score50%to62%63%57%56&and so on. But so many unfortunate.too.what the worse thing ugc doing one cant understand.ther is once again disputable result publish by ugc…see daink jagran16 november.

    [Reply]

  101. Mohammad Haider says:

    I hope UGC will declare supplementary result on minimum gratifying criteria Mohammad Haider Mob. 9336299696

    [Reply]

    kaviraj Reply:

    hi all result will come soon by kerala high court …kelash variyam advocate says that petion is going on… u can ask by phone no….04842400675 is cell no. of advocate kelash variyum

    [Reply]

    PRITI Reply:

    Its really a miracle, I found my place in supplementary list. Thanks to the candidates who fight for us

    [Reply]

    N. Sharma Reply:

    can any one tell me wats d criteria they followed in declaring supplementary result….i got aggregate 60.92% marks and still nt cleared….plz help me guys in understanding dis issue….

    neha sharma Reply:

    Actualy suplmntry result have no any clear criteria.you can chek few roll no in gen. Category score less than you but among the successful list.but same like so many candidate cant mke there place in list .

    PRITI Reply:

    subject wise merit is prepared.

  102. hai when kerala hc result will come about net exam results

    [Reply]

    neha sharma Reply:

    Probably in next week

    [Reply]

  103. thks madm..how can get new informations of hc case satus about net pls help

    [Reply]

  104. jyoti prasad says:

    i m also a victim of ugc is there any one who tell me about the new eligibility criteria of the supplementary result as i hv got 52% belonging to sc category and i m not qualify

    [Reply]

  105. kalyani prasad says:

    hello friends i hv got 54.84% in ugc net june 2012 and i belonging to sc category but still i m not qualify even in the supplementary result i dont understand what ugc is doing and what i can do ? so plz help me and give some suggestions. thanks.

    [Reply]

    SWAPNAPRIYA SETHY Reply:

    @KALYANI PRASAD., SAME HAS HAPPENED WITH ME AS WELL. I GOT 54.86% IN COMMERCE AND BELONG TO SC CATEGORY BUT NOT IN MERIT LIST.. DON’T KNOW WHAT TO DO NOW..

    [Reply]

  106. A>MOHAN REDDY says:

    In June2011, Dec.2011 and JUNE2010,Dec.2010 UGC has reduced the percentage 50 to 45for general candidates,Now UGC raised aggregate to 65 percentage.This is showing whenever they did not getting qualified candidates means reduced the % and whenever more candidates are passed means raised the%. Is it the rule like that .Are we living in the democratic country or dictator country.Iam asking the answer from HRD Minister of central government.

    [Reply]

    vikas Reply:

    pls inform about court result

    [Reply]

  107. Hello friends I am from Bathinda, Punjab. I got 60% in Visual Arts. I am strongly against this injustice done with thousends of students. Friends whichever group has filed the case I want to join that group and help them financially and personally plz contact me. 09478737342
    Thanks

    [Reply]

  108. rajeev sharma says:

    nisha says:

    same here. i am a student of Lib.& Inf.Sc i got 60% percent but not clear.
    and i support to all step, and i want law case agnaist to ugc now, pl. infrom , if you have any better advice

    [Reply]

  109. Dear Friends,

    My elder brother too suffered of this Useless Grant Commission so called UGC. I am working in one of the MNC as Manager and I wish to help all those who suffered of UGC’s unfair act.

    I am encouraging my brother to file a suit against UGC in DELHI high court as I understood UGC comes under Delhi Jurisdiction, but I also advised him to gather information about professors from Maharashtra who appeared this exam of UGC NET that was held on 24th JUNE’12 and are suffered due to sudden change is selection criteria process earlier set by UGC. This exam is not for seeking admission to any College for any course but to grow in your Teachin professional and those who got above 50% in this exam are eligible candidate who cleared UGC NET exam is my belief… The next step I advised is I want to know how do I get these victims together and file a suit against UGC…This must be done on priority… So, those who are from Maharashtra or any other state and consider yourself as victim, please do send email to below ID’s in next couple of days with few details of your’s:

    My email ID: Shailendra.k@hotmail.com; shailendra7480@gmail.com

    You need to mention below details in your name:

    Full Name:

    Contact No:

    Residential Address:

    Exam Serial No:

    Exam Code:

    Center Code:

    Marks obtained…Paper I, Paper II and Paper III, as well as Agreegate of this….

    if any other relevant information you wish to share, please do so….

    Please remember, this is INDIA and one has to fight for his right….and when you are right you must fight.

    I wish all the best to those who cleared NET exam and wish justice for those who victim of UGC unfair practices…

    Please remember, we are running short of time and I am eagarly waiting for huge responses…

    Lets’ fight and win this battle….Good Luck

    Shailendra K

    [Reply]

    PADMA Reply:

    Sir,
    I am from Kerala,is it possible to file a suit now? Already the proceedings had started na?
    PLS REPLY ME….

    [Reply]

  110. i got 58.89% in ugc management bt did not qualify ugc should trasparent for the same before the examination

    [Reply]

    johon decruz Reply:

    You should file a suit against ugc for save your right.shipra do it.
    good luck

    [Reply]

  111. UGC has not passed me in net june 2012 even after getting 64.57% marks in Geography under roll no. 72800093. What an injustice by ugc !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    [Reply]

  112. Please do update in this page about kerala High Court’s verdict…..and whether it will be applicable to all candidates who didn’t file the suit. pls tell me…

    [Reply]

  113. I have scored 54% in paper , 78% in paper 2, 52% in pan paper 3, aggregate is 60% .My subject is economics.But my name is not in the merit list.I am from kolkata. Please help me whom I will contact for this injustice of ugc.

    [Reply]

    Avijit dasgupta Reply:

    I am filing a writ petition against UGC for this injustice within few days in High Court of Kolkata with others. You can join us. Mob— 9830254556

    [Reply]

  114. Mohammad Haider says:

    According to Kerala High Court Advocate hearing has been completed and decision will come maximum with in one weak. friends pray for favorable decision. Cont. No. 9336299696, 9598741498

    [Reply]

    Mohammad Haider Reply:

    ok

    [Reply]

  115. my roll no is60010359.belongs to obc category.aggregate 59.43% secured .but i failed to find my result in supplementary list.kindly help me…my mob-09938440106.what about kerala court verdict
    help…..

    [Reply]

  116. preet kiran says:

    i,m with 62.29% marks ineducation with gen.cat.but i,m not pass still now.tell me what will i do?

    [Reply]

  117. chandankumar says:

    Mohammad Haider i too have qualified in three papers of net conducted by ugc in June 2012 but my result is not in the list. Dear I request you to let me know the verdict of Kerala high court as soon as it is released.

    Thank you.

    [Reply]

  118. Mohammad Haider says:

    Any person file petition against ugc net result in U.P. I want join that group. Pls. Contract 9336299696, 9598741498

    [Reply]

  119. Mohammad Haider says:

    Any person file petition against ugc net result in U.P. I want join that group. Pls. Contract 9336299696, 9598741498 email:- haider_786.110@rediffmail.com

    [Reply]

  120. Has anyone filed writ petition from j&k or is intending to do so,then plz inform me on cel no. :-9906536896

    [Reply]

  121. whether any hon’ble high court has passed any direction against ugc in this matter.plz post a comment

    [Reply]

  122. KALIDAS KARAK says:

    A STUDENT NAMED THIRUPATHI GADIGOPPULA IS QUALIFIED UGC NET 2012.HE SCORED 38%,44%,AND 40.57% IN 1,2,3 PAPER RESPECTIVELY.HIS ROLL NO-46870286.SUBJECT CODE-87 .HOW IT IS POSSIBLE? TAKE A STEP AGAINST IT.
    BY DR.K.KARAK.

    [Reply]

  123. KALIDAS KARAK says:

    PLZ TELL ME THE LATEST HEARING OF KERALA AND DELHI HIGH COURT ABOUT UGC NET RESULT 2012.

    [Reply]

  124. gagandeep singh says:

    hello i m gagan from punjab. i want to join writ in delhi high court against ugc, i have scored 54.86% in management. plse tell me what to do. gagandhillon0088@yahoo.com

    [Reply]

  125. Mohammad Haider says:

    According to some reliable sources Keral High Court Decision is coming tomorrow Pray for favourable decision. 9336299696, 9598741498

    [Reply]

  126. The govt of Kerala has published the notification for lecturers in various subjects. So now since I have not qualified in NET based on the new criteria, I can not apply for it. The next notification will come only after may be 6 or 7 years. There were plenty of vacancies as a large number of lecturers will be retiring. I missed this golden opportunity only because of UGCs immature decision. I don’t know what happened to all those cases in different course. I dont know when there will be a verdict.And even if there is a verdict will it be in our favour. By the time the verdict comes we would have lost a lot of opportunities. To be a college Lecturer was my greatest ambition. UGC has ruined my dream.

    [Reply]

  127. hey some one knows about whats happening at Keral High Court

    [Reply]

  128. any chance of second supplementary result

    [Reply]

  129. UGC just thinks itz just to sit in an examination and to give exam.. but UGC does not see or know the hard work n sleepless night of the student just to clear one examination. itz a competitive exam n scoring even 60% in dis means a lot, just on this basis that many students has cleared the exam or fulfilled the minimum qualifying criteria, UGC cannot raise its percentage at random….
    after this qualifying students in supplementary result who scores 46% marks UGC proves that it has whole sole authority to do whatever they want…
    it clearly means that students who scores 46%marks in SC/ST/PH category is more intelligent than a person scores 60% in gen. category…
    itz really a injustice to the gen category students that as per the criteria UGC gives 9% grace(i.e from 55% to 46% ) to sc/st/ph candidates where there is no grace seen for gen. candidates…
    just waiting for high court decision to make fair result and to stop UGC from playing with the future of students by issuing an unfair result…
    all the best to all…

    [Reply]

  130. MADHAVI DURGA BHAVANI KODI says:

    I have scored an aggregate of score of 61.71.% and qualified as per qualifying criteria released by UGC Net Jun’12 and i belong to OBC (Non-Creamy Layer) category. But at the time of filling the application by oversight my caste has got updated as general. With respect to the above i have mailed to the concerned requesting for correction with all original certificates. But till today none of the authorities are bothered to respond in-spite of repeated mailers. There’s no response on phone also every time the phone is busy not able to connect even a single time. Is this the way how UGC Net functions. Can’t human error’s be rectified with all supporting documents??????????????????????????

    [Reply]

  131. How could ugc produce suppl. result of net when the case was in the kerala high court ? Is it not contempt of court ? Fight against ugc for your right .Winning chance 100%.

    [Reply]

  132. Dear Divya from where u got information that UGC is reducing grace marks from 55% to 46% in respect of SC/ST for june exam (.) Also agree with jaideep it will lead contempt of court

    [Reply]

  133. sir mera rol.no.72204179 h mujhe overall 64.57% marks mile h fir bhi mera roll no.result me nhi h kya kiya jaye

    [Reply]

  134. plz tel me when court decision wil com

    [Reply]

  135. any chance of second supplementary result. I am an ST and missed the percentage by mere 0.14%.

    [Reply]

  136. second supplementary results announced by UGC has lots of name who have not scored even 55% but yet qualified for lecturership. How is it possible. It only means corruption. check this enrolment numbers : 46870245 46870277 46870286, their may be many like these please check guys. This is injustice by UGC.

    [Reply]

  137. i had got 54.86% so i should qualify as an ST as these above peoples have also qualified without scoring 55%. My enrolment number is 36100252

    [Reply]

  138. have any latest information. it is highly needful for concentrate Dec..30. exam

    [Reply]

  139. I M SC CANDIDATE AND I SCORED 56% 46% 54% AGGREGATE IS 52% BT I M NOT PASS… DIS IS UNFAIR TO US AND NOW UGC IS NOT PUBLISHING CUT OFF FOR JUNE OR DEC… MY ROLL NO IS 201120152.
    I M READY TO TAKE STAND 4 DIS BT I DNT KNOW WHT TO DO… I HAVE NO KNOWELEDGE FOR FILING CASE CAGAINSG UGC. MY EMAIL ID IS MESINGH.WANNAA@GMAIL.COM

    [Reply]

  140. I M SC CANDIDATE AND I SCORED 56% 46% 54% AGGREGATE IS 52% BT I M NOT PASS… DIS IS UNFAIR TO US AND NOW UGC IS NOT PUBLISHING CUT OFF FOR JUNE OR DEC… MY ROLL NO IS 261120152.
    I M READY TO TAKE STAND 4 DIS BT I DNT KNOW WHT TO DO… I HAVE NO KNOWELEDGE FOR FILING CASE AGAINST UGC. MY EMAIL ID IS MESINGH.WANNAA@GMAIL.COM

    [Reply]

  141. kerala high court verdict in feveour of petitioner

    [Reply]

  142. Kerla hc decision in favour of petitioner only not for all.sory for others only for kerlites

    [Reply]

  143. kerala court verdict decleared it is in favour of petitioner…..

    [Reply]

  144. Justice wins! High Court favours candidates in UGC NET case
    Candidates call it Kerala High Court’s “Christmas gift” for them. The much awaited judgement has come today and thanks to the verdict, those who moved court challenging the University Grants Commission’s policy of raising the minimum criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET) after the declaration of results won. If delayed, this would really have been ‘denied justice’ as Kerala PSC had issued notifications for recruitment of college lecturers and as the verdict has come before the last date of application, candidates has not lost the opportunity.
    Candidates from all over the country had been looking forward to this verdict and their prayers have been answered.
    The NET examination of June 2012 was different in itself for being completely in the objective mode. Answer keys were published in the website and when the results were out, those candidates who were sure of success could not believe that their dreams had been shattered. Apart from the minimum qualifying criteria in three papers, UGC also brought forth the criterion of a raised aggregate score. As per the new criterion, only those candidates who scored 65% (GEN), 60% (OBC) and 55% (SC/ST) cleared the test. After staging protests, some candidates decided to move court on the matter.
    UGC tried to back their decision by arguing that the raising of minimum criteria was to keep the quality of collegiate education up.
    In November, UGC published a supplementary list in which around 15000 students cleared. But nothing was said regarding the criteria on which the list was made. The anomalies in it proved to be a strong ground in favour of those candidates who challenged the UGC.
    The question whether the verdict is valid only for petitioners remains in the minds of candidates.
    ref; http://news.entecity.com/justice-wins-high-court-favours-candidates

    [Reply]

  145. wil court judgment be implemented on all???

    [Reply]

  146. hello all, what will happen next? the 40+40+50 % people will get the certificate? or only to those who filed suit? pls discuss

    [Reply]

  147. Kerala high court verdict is in favour of petitioners. for mor detail read THE HINDU page 9 dated december 18,2012

    [Reply]

  148. whether the kerala high courts decision will be applicable to all candidates who didn’t file the suit. pls tell me…

    [Reply]

  149. 2000 candidates who filled the case in kerala has woned the battle yesterday………whos has wrtten and has cleared as per the norms please fight ………..legally we will get the positive result definately

    Home >Nation Kerala HC quashes revised qualification for UGC NET
    ByExpress News Service – KOCHI

    18th December 2012 11:43 AM

    The Kerala High Court on Monday quashed the UGC decision of increasing the qualification marks for the National Eligibility Test. “Fixing of higher qualification marks as 65, 60 and 55 per cent respectively for general, OBC and SC/ST categories, that too just before the publication of the result, cannot be justified and it is not supported by law,” the court held.

    Justice T R Ramachandran Nair issued the order while considering a batch of 2000-odd petitions challenging the UGC decision. The court declared that all the petitioners who have secured the separate minimum prescribed in the notification have cleared the NET and asked the UGC to issue certificates to them within a month.

    Kaleeswaram Raj, counsel for some of the petitioners, submitted that UGC had no authority to make any change in the aggregate minimum for a pass in the test. It was the moderation committee appointed by the UGC, consisting of senior academicians, which had recommended the qualifying criteria, so that it is illegal, the petitioners said.

    The UGC submitted that the qualifying criteria was posted on its web site on declaring the examination results.

    It had been clearly stated in the original notification that candidates should obtain minimum required marks in each paper. It had also been said that the qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship and eligibility for lectureship would be decided by UGC before the declaration of results.

    However, the court pointed out that the candidates were never told about raising the aggregate mark.

    “Adoption of such a standard at the final stage affected the expectations of large number of candidates adversely. Even if the UGC has the power to fix a standard, it ought to have been exercised in a proper and fair manner,” the High Court said.

    First name Surname Receiver’s email

    Email 2PrintA+ A A-
    More from this section
    Effective deterrence must to protect nation: Pranab
    ‘Maoist problem biggest security threat for CRPF’
    Delhi gang-rape case to be tried on fast-track basis: Shinde
    Mulayam raises Muslim quota issue in Lok Sabha
    ‘Coal set to surpass oil as world’s top fuel within a decade’
    Shiv Sena dismantles Thackeray ‘memorial’ at Shivaji Park
    Comments(1)KERALA High court quashed the new qualifying criteria fixed by the UGC after conducting the NET for Lectureship. The high court clearly expressed that the UGC did not confer any right on to fix high Marks after the test and it affected the Candidates, as well as violates the Article14 of constitution. Source: The Hindu , Dt.18-12-2012,Topic: Kerala High Court quashes new UGC marks criteria in lecturers’ test Now, what could be the qualifying criteria of SET-Tamil Nadu 2012?

    Posted byRufusdevaat 12/18/2012 20:13Reply to thisReport abuse

    Page 1 of 1 Post a Comment
    Your name
    Your e-mail address *

    Body * 1000 characters left

    Type the two words:Type what you hear:Incorrect. Try again.

    All comments will be reactively moderated
    Disclaimer: The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. Comments are automatically posted live; however, newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

    [Reply]

  150. The verdict came in Kerala High court on 18/12/2012. It quashed ugc s revised norm. We won the case against the UGC. But I dont know if the petioners alone will get the benifit .or all those who qualified accrding to the previous notification. If we won in Kerala , does it means that others in other states will get the benifit. I urge all others in different states to move strongly.

    [Reply]

  151. We won in Kerala. The High court quashed ugc s revised norm. Now all those who have got the original minumum score will pass. The court directed to issue the certificate with in a month.

    [Reply]

  152. I have acquired the minimum qualifying marks in ugc net june 2012. paper 1- 66% paper 2-50 and paper 3- 54% of obc category? what is ugc going to do with the judgement of kerala high court , plsz let us know

    [Reply]

  153. i have scored 56%aggregate (OBC) But not qualified. .in supplimentary list 59%(General)Have qualified.5% relaxation should be given to OBC candidates.This is in justice.

    [Reply]

  154. Ankit Kumar sharma says:

    I think the member of UGC are mindless and they cant understand the problem of Gen student.

    [Reply]

  155. Deepika Pandey says:

    Hi I have also appeared in the UGC NET exam of June 2012 and as per the answer key I have qualified the exam by 55% and when I came to know about the final result got a shock because of not finding my roll number later I came to know that UGC has determined the criteria of 65% for qualifying the eligibility criteria for Lectureship but this is wrong UGC cannot change the criteria after declaring the result it is unfair please help me…..

    [Reply]

  156. ABHISHEK KUMAR says:

    I have got 64.57% but i haven’t found my result. I have asked UGC through RTI why I have not qualified? UGC simply repaly as per result you have not qualified.

    [Reply]

  157. MANOJ KUMAR P.S says:

    yes there is a point, one such question was paper iii computer science, Q 5 related Amdahl’s law and its answer is option B 3.22 (rounded) formula s(N)=1/((1-p)+(s/N)) but is marked as X, and another one is Q10, i have to solve it today. what ever 2×2=4 marks is a great miss

    [Reply]

  158. supplementary result has been published based on the request of Computer Science. totally unfair, inhuman and injustice… They don’t know the actual criteria for quality in higher education. Every 6 months UGC has changed the criteria of higher education.. In 2006 UGC announced that all M.Phil. are NET exempted but in 2009 they are not NET exempted. Before 2012 Net qualification marks 45%(GEN) but Now 65% (GEN). but very lopsided discrimination between GEN, SC/ST, OBC/PH. where NET qualification criteria for General (65%) but SC/ST 55%(10% difference) . It need 10 marks difference not 10%. UGC is plying with our future……..

    [Reply]

  159. Hello Friends, I am Parminder from Mumbai. After judgement of Kerala hugh court Lot of candidated are going to file a case from their respective state. If you are also intersted to file a cose againts UGC then pleas contact me my email id is parminder44@gmail.com

    [Reply]

  160. RAJAN SAROHA says:

    24-DEC-2012

    DEAR CANDIDATES OF JUNE 2012,
    CHEERS !!!!!!!!!!!! AS ON FRIDAY-21-DEC-2012, HON’BLE SUPREME COURT HAS PASSED A JUDGEMENT IN FAVOR OF ALL CANDIDATES . IN OTHER WORDS ALL CANDIDATES ARE NOW CLEARED ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL CRITERIA OF U.G.C..
    U.G.C. IS EXPECTED TO CIRCULATE THE ABSOLUTE NEW RESULT VERY SOON ( HOPEFULLY -ACCORDING TO MY SPECULATION BEFORE 15-JAN-2013 )

    RAJAN SAROHA
    rajansaroha@gmail.com

    [Reply]

  161. there is no use trying to argue.it was the problem of ugc!!they could hav introduced negativ marks or they could hav increased the pass % before the exam!when it was tough n descriptive they reduced the marks in the previous exams but now when it was easy they understood their ffolishness and was trying to allow minimum students to pass..where are all these people going with net qualification?it creates more unemployed ugc net qualified candidates!

    [Reply]

  162. Satyam Nagar says:

    RAJAN SAROHA can u plz tell me the writ no. under which the judgment has been passed? and are u sure or its jst a guess ?

    [Reply]

  163. PARVEEN GOYAL says:

    DEAR RAJAN SAROHA, PLS TELL ME THE JUDGMENT NAME………..

    [Reply]

  164. It is true ,all those who are qualified as per ugcs previous criteria have been declared passed . All over India.
    Refer The Times of India dated 23rd or 24 the December.

    [Reply]

  165. Sir,

    I have got 44% marks in third paper History (ie,66 Marks).But i have cleared 1st & 11 Paper above 50%marks. My question is shall igot excemption to round off 1% marks (ie,44% to 45% marks).I am an OBC Candidate. Kindly Advice my email id is abhijithba@gmail.com

    [Reply]

  166. Sir,

    I have got 44% marks in third paper History (ie,66 Marks).But i have cleared 1st & 11 Paper above 50%marks. My question is shall igot excemption to round off 1% marks (ie,44% to 45% marks).I am an OBC Candidate. Kindly Advice my email id is abhijithba@gmail.com

    [Reply]

  167. I have got 54 in paper – 1 , 40 in paper – 2, and 68 in paper – 3. I belong to the OBC category. can any body give me the suggestion whether I will be passed in the publication of new result as per the sc order.

    [Reply]

  168. You can file a Writ Petition in the Kerala High Court and make the PSC also a party in the case. Apply for the Lecturer post and produce the application form before the court and get a direction from the court to accept the application by the PSC provisionally till getting the net qualified certificate from UGC. After getting the net qualification you can produce the same before the PSC and get it accepted. Usually the case is to be filed before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal. Thiruvananthapuram. But you can file the same before Kerala High Court as the UGC is the main party.
    I am an advocate handling these matters and if you want any further clarification my email id is gaji.lakshman@gmail.com.

    [Reply]

  169. Dear Frnds,

    The news regarding the HON’BLE SUPREME COURT PASSED A JUDGEMENT IN FAVOR OF ALL CANDIDATES . IN OTHER WORDS ALL CANDIDATES ARE NOW CLEARED ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL CRITERIA OF U.G.C. This news appeared in Times of India Pune Edition (Page 3) Only. And one Kannada News Paper Vijay Karnataka. Is anybody who have found this news elsewhere other than this. Plz inform.

    [Reply]

  170. Dear Frnds,

    The news regarding the HON’BLE SUPREME COURT PASSED A JUDGEMENT IN FAVOR OF ALL CANDIDATES . IN OTHER WORDS ALL CANDIDATES ARE NOW CLEARED ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL CRITERIA OF U.G.C. This news appeared in Times of India Pune Edition (December 24, 2012 Page 3) Only. And one Kannada News Paper Vijay Karnataka on December 26, 2012. Is anybody who have found this news elsewhere other than this. Plz inform.

    [Reply]

  171. arun kumar chaturvedi says:

    thank u sir i m very grateful 2 u

    [Reply]

  172. Guys!!
    R u sure about the judgement ???

    [Reply]

  173. Hello Everybody,
    Is it true that Hon`ble SC made it official declaration as cleared the June ’12 Net exam those who have obtained the minimum criteria. ? If so ,please give me in details information about the SC direction to UGC Net at the earliest. This is my e.mail :www.raisokdb@yahoo.in
    I`m from Tripura and belongs to ST. With regards,

    [Reply]

  174. kindly check the same news on the following address also…
    http://www.indiaeducationreview.com
    m.oneindia.in/education/news/2012/12/24

    [Reply]

  175. Sir,

    I have got 44% marks in third paper History (ie,66 Marks).But i have cleared 1st & 11 Paper above 50%marks. My question is shall igot excemption to round off 1% marks (ie,44% to 45% marks).I am an OBC Candidate. Kindly Advice my email id is abhijithba@gmail.com

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz2GE68RVgF

    [Reply]

  176. nithyananda says:

    I have got 44% marks in third paper computer science (ie,66 Marks).But i have cleared 1st & 11 Paper above 50%marks. My question is shall i got excemption to round off 1% marks (ie,44% to 45% marks).I am an OBC Candidate. Kindly Advice my email id is nbdevadiga@gmail.com

    [Reply]

  177. Why do we have to produce the certificates of NET? The psc verifies it only at the time of interview after the short list of the exam is published. So why do we have to worry? Isn’t it enough to just pass the exam?There are many people who apply for a post without all the qualification. But the just write the exam for mere experience or just time pass. So what is this hype about certificates?

    [Reply]

  178. nithyananda says:

    i need the final selection criteria of net june2012 for obc candidates

    [Reply]

  179. I am also suffering from ugc injustice towards the candidates. please do something……………

    [Reply]

  180. I also support this

    [Reply]

  181. Tawseef Amin Trumboo says:

    Every body felt happy when they came to know that Supreme Court has quashed the new criteria fixed by UGC. But, Who was the Judge and who was the advocate of the supreme court judgement. Plz communicate, every body is in fix, even UGC is doubtful about the supreme court judgement. So, once again plzz, plzzz and plzzzz if any body hav solid and detailed information then do inform every body.
    Thanx…

    [Reply]

  182. Tawseef Amin Trumboo says:

    The name of supreme court judge or lawyer, who gave the verdict infavour of the candidates is absconding, so if any body has any information in this regard kindlyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy do inform, otherwise it seems a pack of lies.

    [Reply]

  183. Tawseef Amin Trumboo says:

    The kerala verdict was given by Justice T R Ramachandran but who gave the supreme court judgement, no body knows, which makes it doubtful, so plzzz inform if any body knows anything about it..

    [Reply]

  184. Dear All……………

    we will get new revised result with min. marks ( June 2012)very soon…………………!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    [Reply]

  185. Dear all………

    It is my humble request to all…..plz dont give/provide any financial support to any body or any group for UGC Net case( like fee for lawyer etc.)

    becoz new revised result will come very soon………..As Per Supreme Court Order………………….

    Dont Forgot my word & appeal………………..

    thanx for your kind of support/corporation……………….

    [Reply]

  186. Mr. Tawseef, I am not sure about the supreme court verdict. There was a news in The Times of India that too I think only in coimbatore edition dated 23rd or 24th Dec 2012 saying that all the candidates who have qualified according to the previous criteria will be declared passed and will be issued certificates. I didn’t see this news in any other paper. I dont know how official this news is. I think it is better to ring the office of The times of India. We in kerala are confussed whether the petiotioners will get the benefit or all . Even I am thinking about filing a petition. But I think eventually the UGC is going to lose. And it is not going to win even if it goes to supreme court.

    [Reply]

  187. all the candidates those who got min. marks he/she will be able 2 pass in this new results( June 2012)………………

    Its true…………………..Believe me …………………but socisl site or group want 2 earn/ collect money just before declaration of the result…………………………….so pls dont give him any kind of money or financial support………………………… for it.

    thank you

    [Reply]

  188. can anybody advice me about the roundingm off of Marks

    [Reply]

  189. Mohammad Haider says:

    Is new result really coming soon

    [Reply]

  190. Please read ……………..
    The University Grants Commission (UGC) has withdrawn its decision to increase the cut-off marks for clearing NET (National Eligibility Test), following Supreme Court’s decision declaring the order invalid.
    “The SC decision is valid for all candidates who sat for the June, 2012 examination. The old cut-offs will be considered and new results will be announced,” informed an official of University of Pune that conducts the NET exam, reported Times of India.

    [Reply]

  191. neeru gupta says:

    i have seen the statement in pune newspaper but why it is not in all state newspaper.

    [Reply]

  192. This news may not be true. Becuase today the Ugc has filed an appeal against the Kerala High court order quashing the ugcs revised norm. If there was a supreme court order already, Will the ugc file a fresh appeal against the court verdict. Unless and untill we get our certificates in our hands we cannot be sure of anything.
    Meanwhile I urge everyone to fight strongly against the UGCs illegal move and this time take steps to bring to justice all the officials in the ugc who are responsible for this injustice so that they are removed from their posts and penalised.
    Anyway the UGC is not going to win.

    [Reply]

  193. today’s hot news.UGC authorities inform Kerala High Court that they are going to put an appeal against the recent High Court Verdict (News in todays Malayala Manorama Daily)

    [Reply]

  194. I am very much happy as i have scored 63% in June 2012, but i am going to appear tomorrow.. all d best to all candidates…

    [Reply]

  195. Narayanaswamy.K says:

    if ugc has appealed again…then why the publications like TOI highlighted “ugc has withdrawn its revised cutoff criteria”….which should clearly meant that ugc will not proceed further with the legal proceedings?

    [Reply]

  196. very true friend i m also one of those many who got stuck by this aggregate rule……….plz help

    [Reply]

  197. UGC may announce revised results as per new criteria in Jan 2013… New year gift….. Reason for delay may be temperament regarding to appear in Dec 2012 exam.

    [Reply]

  198. Are you from Gujarat, i think we must take some action.

    [Reply]

  199. The result of net exams June ,2012 totally illegal. I also obtained the minimum criteria set by UGC net as per its notification before the exam was held. I as a ST candidate from Tripura ,have obtained the marks as follows: Paper -I,II and III are 54%,50% and 41.33% respectively;(all together :47.43% ) in June ,2012 exam.Please suggest me what to do at this stage?

    [Reply]

  200. Narayanaswamy.K says:

    Dear friends find the answer keys for the subject English;

    Paper 2:

    1A 2B 3B 4D 5D 6C 7A 8B 9A 10D 11B 12D 13A 14D 15D 16A17B 18C 19A 20D 21A 22B 23B 24B 25B 26A 27C 28A 29A 30D 31A 32-NONE 33B 34C 35D 36B 37D 38B 39A 40B 41C 42A 43C 44B 45A 46-B/D 47C 48B 49C 50A

    Paper 3:

    1c 2a 3d 4b 5a 6- 7c 8d 9d 10c 11b 12b 13a 14c 15c 16a 17d 18c 19b 20d 21a 22c 23b 24b 25b 26d 27b 28a 29b 30c 31a 32c 33d 34a 35a 36c 37c 38a 39a 40a 41a 42b 43d 44c 45-46d 47c 48d 49d 50c 51d 52a 53b 54d 55b 56d 57b 58a 59d 60b 61c 62a 63a 64-65d 66d 67-68d 69a 70b 71-72c 73c 74d 75c

    The above answer keys are 99% right…but I advise you to consult the better source and wait till UGC publishes the keys officially.

    Regards:
    Narayanaswamy.K
    preranajeevi@gmail.com

    [Reply]

  201. Mathuraswamy.P says:

    i have appeared management, i got 58.86% , first when UGC announce to apply online that itself they have to tell that pass percentage consider for all the three papers

    [Reply]

  202. Ashish Dugar says:

    Madam..thoda padhai pe dhyaan de deti toh aisa nahi kahna padta.
    Bilkul Jamai mat bano Desh ke.

    [Reply]

  203. Mathuraswamy.P says:

    Anyway court will consider students life, truth never fail

    [Reply]

  204. i know not qualifying june net must be disheartening but u must also see that almost 4 times more students passed the june exam as compared to past exams, if still ugc passes even more students as per their earlier criteria then what will happen probably 1 lakh or more will pass ugc net. do u think that if there will sooooo many net qualified students then passing net will a great advantage, no, the importance and value of the exam will reduce.

    [Reply]

  205. IF U THINK VALUE OF EXAM WILL BE DOWN …UGC MUST THINK BEFORE EXAM N BEFORE MAKING EXAMINATION AS MCQ QUESTION…..IF THEY HAVE PASSING WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM????

    [Reply]

  206. before June 2012, candidate qualified Net minimum at 45% (is it a good quality ! ), but now minimum 50% (is it Not good quality ! ), I think quality of Net depends on how many candidate appeared (temporal change) not in knowledge. So nobody knows the actual quality of Net for lectureship. according to Sapna if many aspirants wants to teaching job the quality of Net reduce (although they have qualified the minimum criteria more than earlier aspirants ) if very few students likes this job than value of Net is High. if UGC declared who qualified net is appointed in college/university within 5 years. then Net is high value until it is just a value of second class masters (55%) degree students.

    [Reply]

  207. Pratik Jain says:

    Dear Friend.

    Can any one let me know the qualifying criteria for Net exam Dec 12 and can anyone share the answere key of Management paper Dec 12

    [Reply]

  208. Sir,

    I have got 44% marks in third paper History (ie,66 Marks).But i have cleared 1st & 11 Paper above 50%marks. My question is shall igot excemption to round off 1% marks (ie,44% to 45% marks).I am an OBC Candidate. Kindly Advice my email id is abhijithba@gmail.com

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz2GnKEKxDC

    [Reply]

  209. Kindly advice me in this regard

    [Reply]

  210. I am totally agree with you saloni, becoz if UGC want qualitative teachers they must start from their home!! they should be effective before expecting excellence from others.!!

    [Reply]

  211. mustak has wrightly pointed about the isuue …And if we kepp minimum 100 per application excluding all expences 100*800000 =80000000 is 8 cr per exam …and interest is 6 lakh per month how many people whould have written this exam repetedly Today the govenment dont to pay for lpg will it pay for our education ?
    money is behind the matter …………….. we all should stand are else nothing will happen

    [Reply]

  212. Its true news but it is related to only Kerala what about rest of the country???????

    [Reply]

  213. Mr. Azad no doubt it is true that Kerala high court is in the favor of NET candidates belonging to Kerala. what about the candidates of the rest of the country????????

    [Reply]

  214. Dear Jack…….it is not only for keralaties……………..It is applicable for all by KHC decision!!!!!!!!!!!!
    kindly read news once again with cool mind……………..

    [Reply]

  215. Bhakti. Mahindrakar says:

    Mr. Jack if the court decision is applicable to all, then when it will be declared by UGC?

    [Reply]

  216. Bhakti. Mahindrakar says:

    When UGC will declare? Actually my subject is economics & my scores r 56, 64 78 i.e 56.57% i m an OBC candidate….

    [Reply]

  217. Mr. Jack if the court decision is applicable to all, then when it will be declared by UGC?
    Actually my subject is economics & my scores r 56, 64 78 i.e 56.57% i m an OBC candidate….
    am i eligible????

    [Reply]

  218. savita nair says:

    Supreme court has finally told on 21st december that all those who have passed in june-2012 examination would be consider according to old creteria so when will the new list be declared???

    [Reply]

  219. savita nair says:

    when wuld ugc release new list for june-2012 resuld wuld cum??i am from maharashtra.even i passed the exam according to old creteria.so can anyone help ??

    [Reply]

    arkokoley Reply:

    The date has not yet been fixed as to when the revised result will come, but according to an official in the UGC, the list may be declared on 13th Jan or between 13th and 20th Jan

    [Reply]

  220. The kerala High court judge Mr. Ramachandara Menon has clarified that all the candidates who had qualifed according to the ugcs previous criteria have cleared the Net and not just the petitioners. So this verdict is applicable to all. But he also ordered that the petitioners should be given the certificates within a month. Now that leaves us with a doubt. When will others get the certificates? Moreover it is not clear whether the ugc will go for an appeal or not. Meanwhile I urge all others , specially candidates from other states also to fight hard in the court. Remember We have to fight the UGC collectively as one nation against the UGC. Now I am sure the Kerala High courts judgement will give a boost and new hope to all others in rest of the country. Unless and until we get the certificates in our hands we cannot be sure of anything.

    [Reply]

  221. I m also suffring from ugc unfair result.i have persued 59.46% in education OBC category.I was mailed regarding this issues to ugc member Dr S S Singh but he was not given satisfactory response regarding this.He was replied me by mail abut cutoff mark in education genral category 62.67 but Obc category 60%
    this was very unfare for Obc students.

    [Reply]

  222. Sir,

    I have got 44% marks in third paper History (ie,66 Marks).But i have cleared 1st & 11 Paper above 50%marks. My question is shall igot excemption to round off 1% marks (ie,44% to 45% marks).I am an OBC Candidate. Kindly Advice my email id is abhijithba@gmail.com

    Read more at http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#FtdtIrp13b5JcJ0v.99

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz2HHgArKbc

    [Reply]

  223. Dear Sir Please provide me Case No. & file of Supreme Court Case. & When will be UGC declare the supplementary result. Please informed me. my mail id is- shreyashju@yahoo.co.in

    [Reply]

  224. MOHAMMED SHAFEEQUE CHALIL says:

    I, Mohammed shafeeque chalil (reg no of ugc net exam: 13290939), now iam so late to realise the matter, so, I beg you to help me in the field of net because I have passed in last net exam if we look the old creteria,
    so my dear pls help me ,what i can do for it?

    Expecting your good reply

    [Reply]

  225. jijo sasidharan says:

    I am a victim of ‘NET-June 2012′
    Supreme court will take decision with in January 15…
    Dont worry…..all of you….we will win …

    [Reply]

  226. chandan gain says:

    Hi friend am chandan from kolkata.i qualified ugc-net june-2012 in management.Now i want to know wheather Ugc arrange any job opportunity for net qualified candidates like state college service commission?

    please give me some advice what can i do now.

    [Reply]

  227. MOHAMMED SHAFEEQUE CHALIL says:

    iam so late , pls inform me what can ido

    [Reply]

  228. hi…. i have got 68% in june 2012 net exam.. bt i have written by roll no. wrong in 3rd paper…. is there any scope of making it correct?……

    [Reply]

  229. hi, i have got 40, 54 and 76 in paper 1st, 2nd and 3rd respectively and overall 48.57%, i belong to SC category. please say anyone have i qualify NET EXAM June 2012. please inform mob.no. 9966716616

    [Reply]

  230. irikhomba says:

    sir, I am obc candidate. i cleared all the paper at june 2012 june exam and my agregate mark is 48%. will it possible to qualified net exam? i found one candidate who is belong to sc he got only 44% in agregate and selected for net. is it right or wrong???

    [Reply]

  231. The battle is not yet over guys. The ugc has appealed against the kerala high court s judgement on Wednesday. They are saying that they didnt do any thing illegal and that they have the right to change the cirteria. And they are determined to improve the quality. So I urge all others in rest of the states to fight hard. Only if we fight this together we can win. Please put more pressure on the ugc. We are almost there! . Fight with all your might!

    [Reply]

  232. Sir,

    I have got 44% marks in third paper History (ie,66 Marks).But i have cleared 1st & 11 Paper above 50%marks. My question is shall igot excemption to round off 1% marks (ie,44% to 45% marks).I am an OBC Candidate. Kindly Advice my email id is abhijithba@gmail.com

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz2HeOR1f4S

    [Reply]

  233. sir i got 51.41 % marks from the subject of tourism administration &management sir i belong the cast bc and i am waiting the net revised result

    [Reply]

  234. Sir,
    i got 52%,56%,48%in paper 1,2and 3respectively and aggregate is 51.43%.I belong to OBC .Am i qualified for NET.Anyone help me.Can i file a sue for that now?

    [Reply]

  235. subhash chandra majumder says:

    ugc’s change of cut of marks is unfair. It only disheartened the aspirants. UGCmust strict its norms ,what it had publised in its advertisement. If they follow unfair practice what type of teacher they expect, an immoral, dishonest teacher? What they will give us in future. I hope Judicial as well as PM &HRM Deptt. will look after the matter seriously and for the sakeof our future and morality directed the UGCto follow the norms i.e . to follow the qualifying marks for june2012 exam. for general candidate 40%,40%,50% and45% for others to follow the norms.My ugc roll no.59170009 for the june 2012 exam. I have come from north eastern state TRIPURA.What shouldI do please advise me friends .My marks is 54,58. 80 except x marks.

    [Reply]

  236. I m also a victim of UGC net june 2012… if u get any further news about net june 2012 then plse informe me as far as possible… My email id is “sumangeo03@gmail.com”

    [Reply]

  237. suman das says:

    plse informe me if u get any new news about net june 2012… my email id is “sumangeo03@gmail.com”

    [Reply]

  238. VINUKUMAR says:

    Hello sir i got 58% in net exam jun-2012.
    Reg no:06210059
    1st pepar 38%
    2nd pepar 71%
    3rd pepar 61%
    in obc categary.
    Am eligible or wat…..

    [Reply]

  239. VINUKUMAR says:

    Hello sir i got 58% in net exam jun-2012.
    Reg no:06210059
    1st pepar 38%
    2nd pepar 71%
    3rd pepar 61%
    in obc categary.

    Wen final list anouncing. We are all waiting.
    Am eligible or wat…..

    [Reply]

  240. I have got 49.5% in new net exam on December 2012. Any chance?

    [Reply]

  241. UGC has posted a new qualifying criteria for June 2012 net exam result today in their website which does not match with the Supreme courts directive could you pls check

    [Reply]

  242. Murugesan says:

    UGC ANNOUNCED THE SAME PREVIOUS CRITERIA FOR THE ELIGIBILITY OF NET-JUNE 2012. SO MANY OF THE CANDIDATE’S HOPE DESTROYED.

    [Reply]

  243. UGC has announced e-cetificate of june 2012 result……….but no chance of publishing revised result…………….I think everything is fake…………?

    [Reply]

  244. this is game of words dont loose your confidance just wait ugc might publish reised result because in new criteria pulished yesterday includes criteria ordered by kerla high court

    [Reply]

  245. UGC has announced e-cetificate of june 2012 result……….but no chance of publishing revised result…………….I think everything is fake…………?

    [Reply]

  246. UGC NET – June-2012 revised result declare upto 30.01.2013 taken time by UGC. we are confident for revised result.

    [Reply]

  247. how can u say that?…..
    we all are just taking since last few months
    …..
    n ugc playing with our emotions…..

    *****Satara Maharashtra

    [Reply]

  248. we should think about collective action against ugc………….
    we have to take help of Media and social sites…… to raise issue all over Country….

    Satara, Maharashtra

    [Reply]

  249. ANY ONE KNOWS ABOUT DECISION OF DIVISION BENCH KERLA HIGH COURT ?

    [Reply]

  250. There was a hearing in the Kerala high court on 21 st January 2013. The ugc had gone for an appeal. Does anybody know what happened? Meanwhile what happened to all those cases pending in other courts in different parts of the country.

    [Reply]

  251. SIR ,I AM KUNDAN ,ROLL NO-49060496,SUB-HISTORY,CAT-OBC,SCORE-IPAPER-64%,II-46%,III-48%,AGRIGATE-52%,KYA MERA RESULT AA JAYEGA,PLEASE CALL ME-9771902463

    [Reply]

  252. The appeal of the UGC in the Kerala High court has been postponed to Feb 5 for hearing . We have to wait for the judgment of Feb 5 in the Kerala High court. Meanwhile does anybody know what the hell is happening in the courts in rest of the country. Specially in Delhi court. Why don’t you people there do something about it.

    [Reply]

  253. will the new result of june qualify more number of jrf also….please tell me if anybody has any idea.

    [Reply]

  254. I have got 49.5% in new net exam on December 2012. Any chance?

    Read more at http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#F1h7ApC8qEDazo9Y.99

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz2JcaLmTNB

    [Reply]

  255. friends tomorrow is the final hearing in KHC hope we get the same what had been given by the judge earlier. i wish all of you get benefit from the courts intervention. as madras high court already given in favour of the students on 31th Jan

    [Reply]

  256. hai I appeared ugc net exam june 2012 and got 55% aggregate. Now in my mail I see the option of down load e-certificate. But I cannot down load as it is blank. Can any one see this?

    [Reply]

  257. we are all the students of India, who have been come under the results UGC/NET of June 2012 must be united and fight against such unruly and monopolies of UGC. because this is the right time can the monopoly and undemocratic activities of UGC will destroy

    [Reply]

  258. 8 Jan 2013 TNN
    NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing.
    The court’s stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF).

    Citing UGC’s notification on its website, petitioner’s counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result.
    When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be declared successful.
    She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of June 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law.
    The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not responded properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In Kerala, the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC notification, as the number of candidates were much more.

    [Reply]

  259. Thanks Surekha. I would also like to inform you all that the hearing in Kerala High court has been postponed to 20th February 2013. Meanwhile I would like you all to fight hard and put more pressure on the ugc legally.

    [Reply]

  260. I have got 49.5% in new net exam on December 2012. Any chance?

    Read more at http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#SZ7OEQYZJI21ZEA2.99

    Read more: http://indiaexam.in/how-to-sue-ugc-in-court.html#ixzz2KOE8eMim

    [Reply]

    Indiaexam Support Reply:

    @Abhijith we don’t want to give you false hopes. We suggest you to wait for the result.

    [Reply]

  261. whether any one knows what progress is going on at nagpur high court about ugc matter ? what is the judgment of madras high court please paste here link of judgment paper if any. further it is very important to know that what will be statergy of ugc if judgments from several high courts throughout the nation comes against it ? whether they would preffer appeal of each order ? being known about all such why they are avoiding to grant certificates to the poor candidates facing there own problems ? waiting?

    [Reply]

  262. Any updation on Kerala HC hearing on 20.2.13. Pls update on that

    [Reply]

  263. I understand that there was indeed a hearing in the Kerala High Court on 20/02/2013.And I hear that the judges were in favor of the students. Next hearing will be on 28/02/2013. If they are not postponing the hearing there will be a final judgment on that day itself.

    [Reply]

  264. Rajnath send me your mobile no.

    [Reply]

  265. ASHISH MAURYA says:

    NEXT DATE OF ARGUMENT IN KHC IS 28 FEBRUARY. PLZ CALL ME IF ANYBODY HAS NEW UPDATE, ON MY NUMBER 8273440688.

    [Reply]

  266. jayaraman n d says:

    Dear friends,
    When the UGC NET June 2012 case comes for next hearing, affected candidates should file an additional plea to stay the recruitment of posts which requires NET qualification like Asst.Professors, Librarians, Physical Directors etc. throughout India., till the UGC publishes revised results. This will attract attention of more people about the plight of the candidates.

    [Reply]

  267. UNNAMED says:

    I READ ALL DISCUSSION FROM START TO END ALL HAS TO READ KERALA HC JUDMNT TO DEVELO THERE LEGAL SENCE .NOT NECESARY TO ASK WHETHER THEY ARE ELEGIBLE OR NOT.NO ANY MERIT FOR UGC IN APPEAL.IMPORTANT TIME OF LIFE BEING EXPENDED TO WAIT FOR DECISION OF DIVISION BENCH OF KHC . KERLA IS HOME OF EDUCATION IN INDIA AND THE ORDER IS OF HIGHEST COURT OF STATE.UGC MAY ADMIT JUDGMENT OF 17 DEC AND CAN SAVE ITSELF FROM FROM FURTHER CONTRAVERCY. WE BELEAVE IN INDIAN JUDICIARY LET US HOPE FOR SPEEDY JUSTICE.

    [Reply]

  268. UNNAMED says:

    PLEASE ANYONE THINK ABOUT POOR STUDENTS OF MAHARASHTRA AFECTED BY WATER CRISES NOT ABLE TO MAINTAIN THESELVES AT THE AGE OF 33. THEY HAD TO WALK MILES TO CONNECT WITH NET.EACH YEAR SUCH PEOPLE EXPENDING THOSANDS OF RS FOR ATTEMPING SUCH EXAMS RESULTING FAILURE FOR THE WANT OF 2 OR 3 MARKS WHAT IS THE USE OF SUCH TRANSPERANCY IF RULES BEING CHANGED MIDWAY. WHAT WILL BE ANSWERS TO THEM TO WHOM WE ALLREADY SAID THAT WE HAVE CLEARED THE NET AND JUDGMENT 17 DEC IS IN OUR FAVOUR ?

    [Reply]

  269. Ruchi Dwivedi says:

    how much more time is there, to get real idea about the JUNE 2012 NET result??

    [Reply]

  270. Unknown says:

    Dear Friends, Any update on KHC Final Judgement on 04.03.13 for NET 2012. Plz update the same.

    [Reply]

  271. wait na karo bahot ho chuka hai. agar har ugc ke sab offices par hum jakr uposhan ke liye bethe our tab tak na hate jabtak o hame result na de. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,…………………………santosh …………………………………

    [Reply]

    bibha pandey Reply:

    santosh ji ab to kuch to karna padega hath per hath rakhkar court ke sirf next date ka wait karne se kuch nahi hoga

    [Reply]

  272. DEAR FRIENDS WE CAN NOT DO ANYTHING SINCE THE MATTER IS PEDING APPROPREATE COURT. Do not irritate as this court is there to determine how we are being cheated by ugc.So dont afraid truth will survive.court has to listen both parties for its final order all arguments impacts upon judgment. We Are strong on merit of the case. let the ugc to plan its way at the court.if court holds our side as correct.”UGC WOULD NOT HAVE ANY OPTION than either to follow the directions of court or further appeal. so just wait

    [Reply]

  273. when i attemped net exam in june 2012 i become very glad as i know that i will qualify intial criteria of net when answer key came it is confirmed i thought i cleared net exam but it was none and vain when first result along with notification came i became very sad. again i got ray of hope when i heard revised result came but there was not my nomber in passed candidates again i disappointed.when i read judgment of khc i was on the top of pleasure subsiquently i read news as to SC judgment i was glad

    [Reply]

  274. I heard khc d bench hearing on 18 March 2013

    [Reply]

  275. rajesh k.k says:

    hearing is over in KHC on 18 march,judgemnt will come verysoon.i heared judges are in favour of students.

    [Reply]

  276. rajesh k.k says:

    hearing of KHC is over on18 march,judgement will come very soon.i heared judges are in favour of students.

    [Reply]

  277. I came to know that hearing of khc db is on 25 march lets hope for best

    [Reply]

  278. Thank you for your updates rajesh. Its a good news. I hope judgment is in our favor . We have waited too long and suffered for too long. Any idea what will happen if the judgement is in our favor. will they go to the supreme court. What is the stand of the supreme court. Was there really a verdict of the supreme court. What about cases in other states.? Any one who knows kindly update. And keep a close watch. Thank

    [Reply]

  279. JUDGMENT OF KARNATAKA HC IS CAME IN OUR FAVOUR LET ME TELL U THAT KERALA CHENNAI AND KARNATAKA HIGH COURTS ALLREADY PRONOUNCED THERE JUDGMENTS SO JUST BELEAVE IN COURTS KYU KI BHAGWAN KI LATHI PE AAWAZ NAHI HOTI

    [Reply]

  280. rajesh k.k says:

    hai friends,KHC hearing is over,judgement will come before31 st march.i heared judges are in favour of students.what are the situation of other courts,give details

    [Reply]

  281. Sharvan Kumar says:

    Sir,

    December 2012 net result has been announced on 25.03.2013 on ugc website, But we don’t know the status of June 2012 revised result.

    Sharvan Kumar

    [Reply]

  282. If the UGC is allowed to function normally without solving the problem of the candidates of june 2012, then soon our problem will be forgotten . For example if the judgment comes in our favor and then a candidates passes in june 2012 exam and December 2012 exam , which reslult will be considered? What about the money and effort spent on December 2012 exam. OK , even if the ugc refunds the money back ,What about the effort and sacrifices made to write the next exam , How can that be refunded. So my point is that the june 2012 result affect the future Net exam also. So as long as the problem is not solved ,No new net exam should be conducted.

    [Reply]

  283. sapna pal says:

    waiting for soon long

    [Reply]

  284. JUST WAIT FOR JUDGMENT

    [Reply]

  285. how can ugc dare to refuse the decision of supreme court i will again apply in sc.

    [Reply]

  286. Reena, what are you talking about. Was there really a supreme court order. Do you have the order number? I am still waiting for the Kerala High Courts judgment. I hear it will be announced within a week. Any way lets put maximum pressure on the UGC. It is not fair to allow the UGC to function normally without solving our problems first.

    [Reply]

  287. if judgment of db kerala high court is not delevered earliar there may be irrepearable loss to candidates. However just keep petions because we lost important time of our golden period of life expecting judgment of the matter date to date eggerly helplessly. god is there who knows our feeling and situation. so just wait for justice dont bother keep faith.

    [Reply]

  288. Sir,
    I am from kerala and I have passed as per old eligibility criteria. Please guide me where to contact as I dont know what to do next. Please help me..

    [Reply]

  289. ANOOP just wait till judgment of division bench

    [Reply]

  290. Dhammapal says:

    Hi,
    As per the SC noticed to UGC to declare the revised result till 13 May 2013 (As per the news in Times of India on 5 May 2013)
    is there any action taken on the SC order by UGC to publish revised result of June 2012?
    Or the Topic is closed without any decision…???

    [Reply]

  291. http://www.petegeraghty.com/uk/prada/ says:

    UGC NET June 2012 unfair cut off and result- What to do xbfdwtuynpm

    [Reply]

  292. anshul kumar porwal says:

    hello,

    I have qualified all paper and but i have also check my answer sheet but 3rd paper checked not correctly when i have checked then 96 marks but only 90 marks give. I hope I am of some help.and revised

    [Reply]

  293. If it is possible someone should go and protest in front the Kerala High court. Only if the division bench pronounce the result in our favor something good can happen. There is no justification on the part of KHC to delay the verdict so long. Protest in front of the court . Atleast once!

    [Reply]

  294. rajesh k.k says:

    sc hearing on 7,8 august,keep confidence

    [Reply]

  295. PLEASE SIR I REQUEST CLOSE THIS BLOG AS WE LOST MORE TIME FOR WATCHING THIS …..situation is reun in marathi “dalbhadri avastha zali aahe

    [Reply]

    Indiaexam Reply:

    We are looking to provide the latest confirmed news on this debate.

    [Reply]

  296. dhanalakshmi says:

    it is very poor action taken by ugc. they made the stunt . ugc ego disturb the students life. please do the needful action to get the favour result i got 58%

    [Reply]

Speak Your Mind

*